All sounds pretty sane to me.
You'd be mad to accept the first offer.
Makes souths seem like a bargain though
I'm sick of people saying that. Crowe and Holmes a Court basically paid 3 million dollars just for the oppurtunity to put millions more into the team. The figure is meaningless, whether it's their 3m or Tinkler's 10m. Noone pays an NRL to make a profit, it's an emotional decision, not a financial decision.
Well if he's serious, he'll have to increase his offer, because at this stage they have said no.
And they're idiots for it, he doesn't have to increase anything because he isn't competing with anyone, he can just wait for them to get desperate.
do you guys realise his worth 500 million dollars...and prob will be worth a billion in a few years...
he will be pouring more of his money in ....
Exactly, just like our owners but don't bother arguing with stupid people kmav23, they drag you down to their level and beat you with expierience.
If they believe the manipulative spin from Tinkler and his cronies, maybe. Those who take time to analyse the situation will realise it's not the best deal for the Knights.
If you think that Tinkler won't make another increased offer (if this one is turned down by everyone) you're a fool.
He doesn't have to increase anything, and why would you want him to. He's not trying to steal the club, his involvement won't start and finish with this 10m, he wouldn't be buying the club just they have enough money to get by day to day. He'd make sure they have what they need to be a success, like what Crowe and HaC have done.
Absolutely, but none of that should mean they need to settle for the chump-change Tinkler is offering.
$10 million sounds like a lot of money to the uneducated but it's nowhere near enough, the Knights deserve more.
Chump change? Are you listening to yourself? The figure means nothing, whether it's 1m or 10m or 20m or 50m, he's paying for the oppurtunity to put even more money into the club. Their board is being painfully idiotic about this.