What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Inu should be picked next week

Marty

Juniors
Messages
208
Not a big fan of Inu and don't mind Goodwin...but Inu has a history of playing really well when picked out of the blue. If Kearney had played him all tournament he would have played the first few games well, but the quality of his games would have quickly deteriorated...but I reckon his selection for the last game would be a master stoke. I would not recommend this selection strategy with anyone else...
 

aqua_duck

Coach
Messages
18,629
Inu knows Jarryd Hayne game inside out, I think he's the best chance NZ have of nullifying him. Goodwin tries hard but he's just doesn't have it, Lyon destroyed him in finals this year, BJ Leilua destroyed him when NZ played Samoa and Watkins destroyed him last night.
Also if Kearney picks Kasiano you might as well hand Aust the cup
 
Messages
12,700
Yeah I wouldn't mind seeing Hoffman at centre. I'd also pick Inu over Goodwin. He just doesn't cut it in defense. I'd probably even pick Nightingale at centre over Goodwin.
 

Tommy Smith

Referee
Messages
21,344
Vatuvei and Inu in for RTS and Goodwin. And of course Moa in for Kasiano.

Inu is rocks or diamonds, but with no solid alternative he's worth a crack.
 

Tone83

Juniors
Messages
1,225
Inu should be the second person picked behind sbw every time NZ pick a team (and only because of sbw's hype). Someone who can tackle? Inu is a try-saving machine, freakish in this regard. Ask Hayne who he wouldn't want to play against on NZ, ask hayne who his top 3 players in the world are, ask folau, both will mention Inu, because both know inu well and know he's better than they are.

Goodwin? Locke? Nightingale? GTFO, what a joke. Like I said he should be the second person picked, but picking minto level losers ahead of him is nothing short of a slap in the face.

That first try blown by nightingale would have been scored by Inu, that's the difference, but a mere taste. He'll also save tries where if he's not there it's a given easy try. There are very few players of his calibre in the history of rugby sports. Today there is only really inglis and hayne, and I'm talking every aspect of the game.

But no NZ can afford to leave him in the stands while they pick goodwin, LOL.

I hope they don't pick him, and I hope they lose 50 nil. God I wanted them to lose against england, and they deserved to, but at least now I'm passionately keen to see them get rogered by the aussies in the final.
 

Tommy Smith

Referee
Messages
21,344
Inu should be the second person picked behind sbw every time NZ pick a team (and only because of sbw's hype). Someone who can tackle? Inu is a try-saving machine, freakish in this regard. Ask Hayne who he wouldn't want to play against on NZ, ask hayne who his top 3 players in the world are, ask folau, both will mention Inu, because both know inu well and know he's better than they are.

Goodwin? Locke? Nightingale? GTFO, what a joke. Like I said he should be the second person picked, but picking minto level losers ahead of him is nothing short of a slap in the face.

That first try blown by nightingale would have been scored by Inu, that's the difference, but a mere taste. He'll also save tries where if he's not there it's a given easy try. There are very few players of his calibre in the history of rugby sports. Today there is only really inglis and hayne, and I'm talking every aspect of the game.

But no NZ can afford to leave him in the stands while they pick goodwin, LOL.

I hope they don't pick him, and I hope they lose 50 nil. God I wanted them to lose against england, and they deserved to, but at least now I'm passionately keen to see them get rogered by the aussies in the final.
813.gif
 

kbw

Bench
Messages
2,502
The problem is that Inu is a complete nutjob. He could come out and have and absolute blinder and win the game but just as easy he could stuff up and lose the game or worse still, walk out of the last training session because he feels like it
 

mxlegend99

Referee
Messages
23,324
Inu should be the second person picked behind sbw every time NZ pick a team (and only because of sbw's hype). Someone who can tackle? Inu is a try-saving machine, freakish in this regard. Ask Hayne who he wouldn't want to play against on NZ, ask hayne who his top 3 players in the world are, ask folau, both will mention Inu, because both know inu well and know he's better than they are.

Goodwin? Locke? Nightingale? GTFO, what a joke. Like I said he should be the second person picked, but picking minto level losers ahead of him is nothing short of a slap in the face.

That first try blown by nightingale would have been scored by Inu, that's the difference, but a mere taste. He'll also save tries where if he's not there it's a given easy try. There are very few players of his calibre in the history of rugby sports. Today there is only really inglis and hayne, and I'm talking every aspect of the game.

But no NZ can afford to leave him in the stands while they pick goodwin, LOL.

I hope they don't pick him, and I hope they lose 50 nil. God I wanted them to lose against england, and they deserved to, but at least now I'm passionately keen to see them get rogered by the aussies in the final.
Whare and RTS should be the first backs picked. NZ wouldn't be in the final without them. RTS has scored a heap of tries and Whare has been a big part of many of the tries NZ have scored and a gun in defence.

Inu is nowhere near as consistent or reliable as these guys to be the second player picked. I'd certainly have him ahead of Goodwin. But he is easily as likely to come up with a play that could cost NZ the game as he is to come up with one that would win it.
 

Springs

First Grade
Messages
5,682
Inu is the kind of player to play in a final in my opinion. His ability to come up with a freak play should just overshadow his ability to be a huge f**k-up. Better than having Goodwin there, who I thought was outplayed by Watkins, so if up against Inglis or Hayne would be destroyed.
 

Tone83

Juniors
Messages
1,225
When has inu ever f'd up? You all keep acting like he has these massive clangers on a regular basis and I can't recall one ever. This is no sam burgess.

His one problem is the same problem a lot of the naturally gifted freakish players have, and that is not-trying. Sometimes he can't be bothered to play hard. Still doesn't make mistakes, just doesn't do anything. Freakish talents haven't necessarily developed a top work ethic, because they didn't need one.

Inglis and Hayne have had whole seasons of just going through the motions too, but you know what they can do, and you know when push comes to shove in an inspiringly challenging game they will rise. This is why you should ignore "form" with such players and throw them in, knowing that no one is going to get the better of them. If they are under fire from a talented player they will be inspired to meet that challenge and prove their own talent, rather than just be run over and humiliated like an "in form" "hard working" inferior loser like goodwin or nightingale will.

Whare and RTS should be the first backs picked. NZ wouldn't be in the final without them. RTS has scored a heap of tries and Whare has been a big part of many of the tries NZ have scored and a gun in defence.
Oh they're great, RTS and Whare deserve their spots and are legit star players, but they're not as good as Inu. If push came to shove inu would get the better of them. You can't say how valuable Inu might have been in this WC if he was used. I have no doubt he'd have a reel of critical plays only he could have done. You don't miss them now because you assume no one could have scored that try or no one could have saved that try or no one could have caught that high-ball, so the moments where Inu would have done something amazing go by without a thought or second glance.

A couple of reminders for people here- Inu was in the squad that won the last world cup, and was arguably one of the best on the field in that game. He also debuted for NZ at fullback against australia in an anzac test, after one first grade game at the age of 20. New Zealand got drummed but Inu was easily their best player, rock solid under every high ball and made a number of try-saving tackles, was at times resisting australia by himself on a pathetic team.

For mine Inu would waltz into the kangaroo squad if he chose to be eligible, when you're speaking of a talent of that magnitude you make allowances for form slumps and complacency. Just like the maroons and australia have with GI and even hodges, and they were right to. Ofcourse you pick them, who are the maroons or roos to NOT pick them? Regardless of their form or recent motivation levels? Similarly who the f are the kiwis to not pick Inu? They need to get real. Inu could potentially win the world cup for new zealand, and not picking him could lose it.
 

Springs

First Grade
Messages
5,682
Inu didn't play in the 2008 final...

And it's been mentioned before, but taking an intercept and slowing to a jog while a Souths player ran him down is a big f**k-up, and that's just one. I remember several others including a big spear tackle that got him suspended for 5 weeks this year.
 

Godz Illa

Coach
Messages
18,745
If Pritchard is back in the NZ left edge will be much stronger than in the semi. Inu has been shit all season and is loose at the best of times
 

Latest posts

Top