carcharias
Immortal
- Messages
- 43,120
I think this thread should be closed, Cronulla & Raiders fans are making themselves look silly.
Thanks mate
Good post
I think this thread should be closed, Cronulla & Raiders fans are making themselves look silly.
Only Nick looks silly out of the Raiders fans, me and Skeepe are lurking the thread with level heads.I think this thread should be closed, Cronulla & Raiders fans are making themselves look silly.
What a load of rubbish
The sharks player is allowed to run back onside.
He didn’t change direction at all.
Then the pass was thrown forward
The ref was right behind it a called it forward straight away.
And if the calls were made correctly, the Sharks themselves would have leaked 22 points in the second half.Are these raiders fans still whinging? How about you don’t leak 22 points by half time in effectively a ‘must win’ game. It was only wade graham coming off at half time, and general apathy from the sharks, that gave you any sort of chance.
Actually it was the assist ref, Gavin Reynolds, that called it forward.
He was marking the 10 metres so was in front of the ball at a bad angle to judge the pass.
No worries mate, I’m glad you enjoyed the post.Thanks mate
Good post
If the flag call was made and the try disallowed, then the call would have dudded the sharks. Katoa may have got through the defence anyway. We get possession off the red error and a set of 6 in the raiders 20 and you proved to leak points. Or maybe we get repeat sets and you lose by more than you did.And if the calls were made correctly, the Sharks themselves would have leaked 22 points in the second half.
What’s your point? There’s two halves in a game.
I did enjoy it.No worries mate, I’m glad you enjoyed the post.
That's your best answer? Seriously?Why does he use the phrase "but in this instance" if not to exclude it from his previous statements?
He's saying generally forward passes are subjective and hard to assess on replay but in this case the pass was ok.
For your information:
BUT
Or as you have used it in that very post. Haha!
- used to introduce a phrase or clause contrasting with what has already been mentioned.
"he stumbled but didn't fall"
synonyms: yet; More
"That's not what he's saying. BUT dont let us stop you..."
Sounds like you're on the track of the real problem here.Yes!
That’s progress
People who know him say Ricky Stuart is a good bloke, but I think he’s a f**king shitbag and should resign
Raiders first try was off a forward pass
Have a look.
Can you please at least do some cursory googling on Newton's law of motion. It's why the forward pass rule is as it is.
It's science. It's fact.
A man running at 15kms per hour (Very conservative estimate of a RL back at full speed) can throw a backward pass and the ball will land in front of where it was thrown from.
The same way you can drop a ball directly to the ground from a moving car and it doesnt land where you dropped it.
What about the strip on Gallen?
We can call it even for the strip on Bateman by Seg.
Next question, Carch.
Which for the record, im OK with, because i have always been in camp "Seg is bitchin"
Never. He's a POS.Does Ricky ever just say the better team won when the raiders lose?
Never. He's a POS.
You wont find a more anti Stuart Raiders fan than me
But even a broken clock is right twice a day.