YesCould think of plenty of other things Jaeman might have done that he wouldn’t want to own up to.
Would make him the much bigger man to come out and say “I did xyz as a kid, I’m embarrassed about it, I’m sorry and I now know better”
If he doesn’t know what he did, could say that also, although it wouldn’t be very credible.
Absolutely relevant what happened. As it stands one bloke is getting lots of stick for saying something, while the other gets to play dumb.
So in your mind my parents don’t deserve to have me just my 5 sisters because I‘m their only child with autism. I’ve suffered from Aspergers my entire life, which made for a very difficult upbringing at times because I had tremendous difficulty interacting with other children. It’s only through relentless hard work from myself and mum and dad that has made the social and confident person I am today. But who cares since I am who I am my parents/sisters/cousins/friends don’t deserve me because I’m autisticSome people just deserve disabled children
Hahaha....whatever. Ricky 100% did the wrong thing. $25k and a pressure game away from his team is a fair whack. He'll definitely think about his words better in the future.
I just don't see the need to crucify the bloke. He has done a shitload of good in charity areas and away from footy, seems a very decent bloke. He made an error and thoroughly deserves the punishment he has been given. Leave it at that.
His obviously targeted Rickys autistic daughter in a hurtful or malicious manner but as a 12 year old which me personally although not good doesn't define him as a person now.‘P**s off’: Kenty slams ‘idiots’ calling for season ban as NRL accused of scapegoating Rickywww.foxsports.com.au
In case you had the desire to watch a bunch of jabbering sycophants bark at each other.
Makes me laugh. Makes me pity them.
And I still can't conjure up in my mind what Salmon could have said that, to Kent, would swiftly change public perception if it was revealed. I cannot imagine what an 11-12 year old said that could be bad enough to allow Ricky Stuart calling him a weak gutted dog 12 years on to seem like a rational decision.
Why do you believe Ricky? What in Ricky’s track record suggests that he is the person to make a rationale and balanced judgment on a slight (perceived or real) by a 12 year old boy over a decade ago?His obviously targeted Rickys autistic daughter in a hurtful or malicious manner but as a 12 year old which me personally although not good doesn't define him as a person now.
Yeah i think what pisses off more people with Ricky is the protection racket run in the media by his mates Kent, Crawley and co that Ricky is absolved from any criticism no matter the situation.Ricky had to get something......but the death penalty did not need to be thrown at him either.