innerwestrabbit
Juniors
- Messages
- 347
Langmacks grasp of the English Language makes Kearney look like Shakespear.But kearney has a better team than Langmack ever did. I think they are probably equal.
Yawn.
Poll should be, how many Kearney is crap threads will appear this year?
Still Stephen Kearney's game plans have a lot to answer for;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kEjI7_BKU9s
Ian Millward Head Coach NQ Cowboys 2008 won only 2 games all year.
The team finished 3rd the season prior.
Nobody can top that, you guys are bring knives to gunfights when you try to beat the Cowboys in worst ever categories.
Bellamy taught him well.I do hate how many times he says the word "again" when he is interviewed
Certainly does not look out of place. Poor Parra fans.The records of the coaches in this thread.
Stephen Kearney - 38 played 8 wins 29 losses 1 draw 21.1% winning record
Mark Murray - 138 played 58 wins 75 losses 5 draws 42% winning record
Tom Raudonikis - 117 played 38 wins 77 losses 1 draw 33.3% winning record
Peter Sharp - 124 played 46 wins 76 losses 2 draws 37.1% winning record
Craig Coleman - 72 played 20 wins 52 losses 0 draws 27.8% winning record
Terry Lamb - 50 played 16 wins 33 losses 1 draw 32% winning record
Alan Jones - 66 played 24 wins 39 losses 3 draws 36.4% winning record
Stuart Raper - 74 played 31 wins 43 losses 0 draws 41.9% winning record
Bob Lindner - 43 played 9 wins 33 losses 1 draw 20.9% winning record
Ian Millward - 14 played 2 wins 12 losses 0 draws 14.3% winning record
Tony Kemp - 37 played 13 wins 24 losses 0 draws 35.1% winning record
Paul Langmack - 35 played 5 wins 29 losses 1 draw 14.3% winning record
Langmack wins it so far for longevity of ineptitude.
If we're going to rely on statistics, do you guys know that someone as well regarded as Cleary has lost more games than he has won.
As for Kearney, isn't he statistically the worst Parra coach in several decades?
Interesting stat, Kearneys former colleague at the Storm, Michael Maguire, has as many wins as Kearney but in 26 less games.
It is clear to anyone that Kearney isn't good enough. Which brings me to a logical point. Who at the Eels thought he was good enough to hire, and why did they think that. Did they rely put that much weight into winning something with NZ? That's vastly different to club footy and he had Supercoach holding his hand anyway.