Yeah we can agree to disagree no worries mate. I don't agree also with discounting Covells selection, it DID happen and was justified at the time.
other than that, no, none of them would , or should have been considered for rep footy in the past 2/3 years, no question and no arguement from me there.
Mate, don't let my opinions on players cloud your impression of my thoughts on the backline. I live for the day we can get our backline back operating to it's potential, we have always been known through history for our backs, and recent decades particulary and we played a brand that allowed them to play footy, ET, Rat, Peach, Barnett, Howland, Best, McGaw.
other than that, no, none of them would , or should have been considered for rep footy in the past 2/3 years, no question and no arguement from me there.
Mate, don't let my opinions on players cloud your impression of my thoughts on the backline. I live for the day we can get our backline back operating to it's potential, we have always been known through history for our backs, and recent decades particulary and we played a brand that allowed them to play footy, ET, Rat, Peach, Barnett, Howland, Best, McGaw.