Timmay
Juniors
- Messages
- 107
He could use his defo money to go for malicious prosecution?If this stretches out for another year or two his career and life are irreparably damaged.
He could use his defo money to go for malicious prosecution?If this stretches out for another year or two his career and life are irreparably damaged.
You make a good point and I will follow up to see what the timeline was exactly.AFB was guilty was he not when Dragons showed him the door or admitted the indiscretion I apologise if that is incorrect DP but if I am right There is a big difference. JDB..... has not even had a pre trial yet and maintains innocence. Our club know more than the peanut gallery
JDB trial date has now been set down for November 2, which I understand has been accepted by defence attorney. The club now needs to make a definitive statement on what action they will take in terms of termination of contracts, allowing him to continue training, seeking compensation from the NRL etc
As it stands, the NRL needs to compensate SGI for De Belin's salary and his salary cap. The Dragons then need to recruit a replacement player to fill the vacant spot in our top 30.JDB trial date has now been set down for November 2, which I understand has been accepted by defence attorney. The club now needs to make a definitive statement on what action they will take in terms of termination of contracts, allowing him to continue training, seeking compensation from the NRL etc
The NRL are going to have lots of issues on their hands if he is found not guilty or the prosecution decides not to continue. I don't think the NRL could have handled this any worse than they have.
Cant get full. he has already received 4 months salary.Cannot be any clearer. Before the start of the season he’s ruled out for the entire season. So therefore we are entitled to full salary cap dispensation. And BJ needs to step up and make a big call. Career over . F me . Not even a trial.
Nrl must be convinced he’s guilty .
You keep forgetting the main difference. The charges should have nothing to do with it. Dragons dumped AFB after admitting guilt. They would have done the same to JDB had he done the same. As dragons are concerned he is innocent ATM until proven otherwise and they are treating him that way. JDB can also turn his life around and may have already. The issue is the Dragons had no choice with AFB after guilt. At that stage AFB may have chosen to not have turned his life around...but with hindsight...yeah we are all geniuses and he turned his life around only after the event.You make a good point and I will follow up to see what the timeline was exactly.
Having said that, AFB was rehabilitated and returned to playing with Manly almost immediately.
Should JDB get convicted, there will be no return to football for him.
There is also a massive difference between the severity of the charges laid.
I was referring to the support provided by the club.
AFB proved that he could turn his life around (he was 19 when we dumped him) and at Manly has developed into one of the most damaging front rowers in the comp.
I am sure the club has more insight than us peanuts but clinging on to one player through 2 seasons has caused the club significant disruption and continues to do so.
The club also has an obligations to the rest of the squad and (God forbid) the "peanut gallery" who support the club.
Nope, the Dragons sacked AFB after his conviction, not after admitting guilt.You keep forgetting the main difference. The charges should have nothing to do with it. Dragons dumped AFB after admitting guilt. They would have done the same to JDB had he done the same. As dragons are concerned he is innocent ATM until proven otherwise and they are treating him that way. JDB can also turn his life around and may have already. The issue is the Dragons had no choice with AFB after guilt. At that stage AFB may have chosen to not have turned his life around...but with hindsight...yeah we are all geniuses and he turned his life around only after the event.
IF JDB is proven guilt...well... the end
I honestly cannot see the difference, after conviction, between a player being given a second chance at the club he played at AND being given a second chance at another club.You keep forgetting the main difference. The charges should have nothing to do with it. Dragons dumped AFB after admitting guilt. They would have done the same to JDB had he done the same. As dragons are concerned he is innocent ATM until proven otherwise and they are treating him that way. JDB can also turn his life around and may have already. The issue is the Dragons had no choice with AFB after guilt. At that stage AFB may have chosen to not have turned his life around...but with hindsight...yeah we are all geniuses and he turned his life around only after the event.
IF JDB is proven guilt...well... the end
Yes, why is it so? The NRL stand him down against the wishes of SGI and then SGI have to sacrifice 4 monts of his salary cap and probably more. This is not a fair system and BJ or someone else at SGI should aggressively complain to the NRL about it.Cant get full. he has already received 4 months salary.
And Manly recruited him on the promise he has turned the page. I don't agree the SGI decision was the right one. Why not obtain the apology and the promise to turn the page?Nope, the Dragons sacked AFB after his conviction, not after admitting guilt.
After. Yes Muzby key word I am looking for. They did not sack him whilst he was still an innocent man as JDB still potentially is.Nope, the Dragons sacked AFB after his conviction, not after admitting guilt.
We could of applied Nov 1. We rolled the dice not the NRLYes, why is it so? The NRL stand him down against the wishes of SGI and then SGI have to sacrifice 4 monts of his salary cap and probably more. This is not a fair system and BJ or someone else at SGI should aggressively complain to the NRL about it.
Promises Promises. It was the right decision by the Dragons at the time. The media pressure otherwise would of been too great. That is unfortunately the way it is. Look at recent history across NRL crimes against women guilty verdicts. It was not a DUI charge accoording to Grennburg which was not signifcant enough as per Inglis.or Tyrome May at PenrithAnd Manly recruited him on the promise he has turned the page. I don't agree the SGI decision was the right one. Why not obtain the apology and the promise to turn the page?
Really... JDB innocent until convicted and currently cannot play football for anyoneI honestly cannot see the difference, after conviction, between a player being given a second chance at the club he played at AND being given a second chance at another club.
Bottom line, he still gets to play football for someone.
My point being that we bent over backwards for players like Packer and Dugan why not a promising 19 year old?
I agree that the JDB scenario will run it's course one way or another but in the meantime, we have a football team that needs to be focused on competing every week.
The NRL introduced a retrospective policy that directly effected JDB and SGI. The courts have ruled they were within their right to do so however, the question remains on who should bare the responsibility to fund this decision. In my opinion, the court should have made this clear when arriving at its decision.Promises Promises. It was the right decision by the Dragons at the time. The media pressure otherwise would of been too great. That is unfortunately the way it is. Look at recent history across NRL crimes against women guilty verdicts. It was not a DUI charge accoording to Grennburg which was not signifcant enough as per Inglis.or Tyrome May at Penrith