Jack DeBelin

[SnowDragon]

Starsky & Hutch in the centres( couldn’t be any worse)

better than laurel and hardy!

 

[blue bags]

HAWAII five o

are really good detectives, no one mess with five-0

sort jacks thread out good, with real expertise in the law

im thinking wing spot, or maybe even fullback, 5-0 jack lord as fullback

 

[Timmay]

He is probably on strict bail conditions. But I think he should be allowed to go an play in England. He doesn't seem to be a flight risk.

He's surrendered his passport.

Good trolling effort, though. Deserved more bites.

 

[Gareth67]

And for coach there is one obvious choice - Kojak he will certainly add some toughness to our forward pack “ Who luvvvvves ya baby ? “ .

 

[WoyD4LWoy]

https://amp.smh.com.au/sport/a-year...0200228-p545bk.html?__twitter_impression=true

 

[Gareth67]

https://amp.smh.com.au/sport/a-year...0200228-p545bk.html?__twitter_impression=true

Mmhm , Tudd Grunburg doesn’t seem to mind either way judging by the expression on his face , then again why would he , the ‘ stand down ‘ rule has pocketed the NRL $30 mill.

 

[Gardenia]

Their rule to protect their commercial interests
Yet the club , through only partial salary cap dispensation and also little notice , are unable to replace with a like for like player.
Furthermore, we must pay money for services we aren’t receiving . Which impacts on US commercially .
We are unable to be bought to a commercial position as if the rule had not occurred, yet the NRL makes a $30 million dollar profit .
It was deemed by the courts the NRL were entitled to enact a rule to basically stop them losing money . which cost a less powerful organisation money . Namely our club.
Surely we have legal recourse here . Unconscionable conduct ? Yes they could argue what was imposed was necessary to protect their interests .BUT they have and had the means to give us compensation so as we did not suffer a loss and did not . I argue that the terms of their no fault stand down rule regarding monetary compensation to the weaker organisation amount to unconscionable conduct .

 

[Lovemedragons]

In such a situation nothing will go back to normal for anyone regardless of the outcome.
So many talking about the outcome for footy about the out come for De Berlin about the outcome for the club and little regard or thought for the girl or the the co-accused.
All about Jack and the team what a disgrace.

Josh Reynolds.

 

[Old Timer]

Josh Reynolds.

What a stupid f**king response on your part.

 

[FlameThrower]

Their rule to protect their commercial interests
Yet the club , through only partial salary cap dispensation and also little notice , are unable to replace with a like for like player.
Furthermore, we must pay money for services we aren’t receiving . Which impacts on US commercially .
We are unable to be bought to a commercial position as if the rule had not occurred, yet the NRL makes a $30 million dollar profit .
It was deemed by the courts the NRL were entitled to enact a rule to basically stop them losing money . which cost a less powerful organisation money . Namely our club.
Surely we have legal recourse here . Unconscionable conduct ? Yes they could argue what was imposed was necessary to protect their interests .BUT they have and had the means to give us compensation so as we did not suffer a loss and did not . I argue that the terms of their no fault stand down rule regarding monetary compensation to the weaker organisation amount to unconscionable conduct .

NRL does not take Dragons Board or its CEO seriously..
we’ve been sold up the river and now with the Trial pushed till later this year - we should be at NRL HQ pushing for full compensation this year.

 

[blue bags]

Josh Reynolds.

silly, dumb, response

 

[blue bags]

 

[st penguin]

Inspector Gadget.

Clueless and only stays in his job thanks to those around him covering his stuff ups.

He’s coach.

Mary is Inspector Gadget? Nah. First of all Inspector Gadget is a cyborg. And if you look at Mary’s press conferences you can clearly see he’s not a.....hmm.

 

[blue bags]

we all love a cup of tea

 

[Willow]

Posts deleted again. Discussion closed thanks to a minority who don't get it.

Thread may be reopened by Admin at a later date, but until then the subject is out of bounds. Thanks to the dopey few.

 

[Willow]

The next forum member who tries to resurrect this topic will have their forum access suspended.

I have just removed a new thread and the member responsible has been warned. We're very easy going, but there is a limit - and that limit has been reached.

I'm sorry about this because it very much goes against the grain of this forum, and quite frankly placing a topic off limits is unprecedented.

That said, the fault is at the feet of those who are ignoring the forum rules and mod requests. So no more warnings.

Unfortunately, the moderating of this topic in this open forum had become a daily routine, taking up hours. Moreover, every post deleted chips away at the good will of our forum community. Hopefully, when the court case is finally done and dusted, we can re-open the discussion.