What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Jack DeBelin

Status
Not open for further replies.

muzby

Village Idiot
Staff member
Messages
45,971
Inspector Gadget.

Clueless and only stays in his job thanks to those around him covering his stuff ups.

He’s coach.
 

The Damo

Juniors
Messages
1,991
Fair enuff.

I made a statement of fact about the cops and not an allegation.

I didn’t specifically link it to jdb. I have no idea if they have it right or wrong and nobody can make that assessment until the case is finalised.

Either way, it may even go to appeal. So a long process.

The no fault stand down is a real dog of a rule.

As I said, better to put the time,money and effort they spend on it into rape crisis centres etc.
I’ve noticed in previous posts you’ve got a habit of conflating allegations with criminal charges. They are not the same thing. It’s a statement of fact that the vast majority of allegations of sexual assault do not result in charges. The NRL’s stand down rule applies to criminal charges, not allegations. In the interests of accuracy and clarity I think you should try not to do that.
 

RufusRex

Post Whore
Messages
63,735
You can disagree, but the phrase ‘not guilty’ is not the same as ‘innocent’. And they use the specific language for a reason.

The easiest example to prove this is OJ ...

Found not guilty but wasn't innocent.

Innocent is whether you did it or not
Not Guilty can mean innocent but also can mean you did it but it just wasnt proven in court.

pretty obvious really.
 

The Damo

Juniors
Messages
1,991
The easiest example to prove this is OJ ...

Found not guilty but wasn't innocent.

Innocent is whether you did it or not
Not Guilty can mean innocent but also can mean you did it but it just wasnt proven in court.

pretty obvious really.
Exactly right. It does seem obvious.
 

Willow

Assistant Moderator
Messages
110,120
The easiest example to prove this is OJ ...

Found not guilty but wasn't innocent.

Innocent is whether you did it or not
Not Guilty can mean innocent but also can mean you did it but it just wasnt proven in court.

pretty obvious really.
That's mostly correct. But the presumption of innocence applies as a basic tenet. The onus is on the prosecution to prove guilt. If the judgement is not guilty, then the presumption of innocence still applies.
 

T-Boon

Coach
Messages
15,985
He is probably on strict bail conditions. But I think he should be allowed to go an play in England. He doesn't seem to be a flight risk.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Top