Could be rookie of the year too, couldn't he?
I don't know why anyone would be surprised that he's good. He's been England's best player of the last few years, and that includes Ellis and Burgess, so he's hardly going to struggle against Penriff.
Could be rookie of the year too, couldn't he?
Could be rookie of the year too, couldn't he?
Could be rookie of the year too, couldn't he?
I don't know why anyone would be surprised that he's good. He's been England's best player of the last few years, and that includes Ellis and Burgess, so he's hardly going to struggle against Penriff.
It wasn't a serious question. Just making the point that he is technically an NRL rookie. He's already better than 90% of props in the comp and probably on par with the rest.
Matt Scott is in a class of his own. Only Gallen if he made a permanent swap could match what he produces week in, week out.
Hannant, Mannah, Civoneceva - Graham could be in their class.
No shit genius. But not in the NRL. And you can hardly call Super League first grade anyway with the amount of reserve graders in it.Rookie?? He's played over 200 first grade :roll:
Graham is more skilfull than Scott.
Both great props though.
He has more ball playing ability then all of the halves and hookers in at the club...
I think you ment in your club.