OzDragon
Coach
- Messages
- 10,842
Hands offDeal!!!!
Hands offDeal!!!!
I said this a while ago the contracts given to Hind, Lewis, Nona and Dodd were nothing but good gesture contracts that would lead nowhere.Hind should have been given a go this year as Marketo and Matthews are rubbish and Lawrie and Sele are not ready. Last year for the Cutters the four best forwards were Wakeman, Hind, Host and Sironen who are all sizeable. Hind is as tough as teak. Mc Gregpr is a goose.Hind and Host should both be in the Top 17 players.
Dude, we have exactly 2 recognised first grade ready props for next year. Everyone else is manufactured or underdone.Yeah, you're right can't argue with your point - except maybe an untried Dufty at FB over an international like Duges.
As for 'barely making an impact in reserve grade' Kerr definately has and imo Hind shows excellent potential but the reserves team has had little stability this year and there's plenty that have ability to step up in FG, totally different arena surrounded by totally different players.
But if some are more comfortable with a 32yo discard, than our juniors then enjoy every minute of it.
Dude, we have exactly 2 recognised first grade ready props for next year. Everyone else is manufactured or underdone.
Kerr's 'impact' has ended with him play off the bench for the last while - in reality, despite the rose-coloured glasses of many of our supporters, he has been ok at best. In fact, Lawrie has outshone him and deserved the call-up to first grade over him, despite being a year younger.
Props, along with hookers, need the most time to adjust to the speed and impact of first grade due to the step up in physicality and demand. Outside of freaks like Klemmer, these guys wont really be fully ready to form part of the prop rotation until at least 23-24years old, and wont really dominate first grade for another year or two after that. Having a player like Graham, who despite his form this year for the dogs still has a LOT to offer in first grade (both on and off the field), would be absolutely invaluable for these kids. A 2 year deal for Graham would provide the leadership and opportunity for the likes of Lawrie and Kerr to get themselves properly ready for a decent length career in first grade.
Kerr, Hind, Lawrie and even Vaughan are exactly why I think signing Graham is worth it for maybe a 2 year deal.
A seasoned international Prop would be an invaluable positive influence on these guys and Graham, if available, is exactly that...
Jonesy
I heard we are only paying40% 400k dogs the rest that was our offer.
I correct well worth it.
Imo
Packer hasn't been anywhere near his best recently.
top 4 side easyI'd be very happy with this-
1. Dufty
2. Macdonald
3. Mann
4. Lafai
5. Rona (hopefully, if not Nighty)
6. Widdop
7. Hunt
8. Graham
9. McInnes
10. Vaughan
11. Frizell
12. Thompson
13. De Belin
14. Sims
15. Ah Mau
16. Host
17. Aitken/Field
as I've said repeatedly in other threads, the moment packer signed his four year deal at the tigers he switched off.Packer hasn't been anywhere near his best recently.
Wow If true then we got a good deal there, well done to Millward. Patience is a virtue they say.