T-Boon
Coach
- Messages
- 15,864
Dare I ask if you have facts to back up this bold, sweeping statement or is it from the same bucket with which you pull your 'great' ideas?
Haha, same bucket.
But I think something like this:
Firstly the applicants own lawyer is going to do an accused bankruptcy search or google their celebrity status, if thats no good they've got to have the client sign something that will explain how the lawyer is getting paid.
Then they are going to have an interview and have to explain: "yep revenge, vindication... beautiful. But see this form here, there is just no column for that stuff".
Go try find one reference to sense of vindication in the girls statement that the newspapers have published. If vindication is literally all you want (as old mate said) then they degrade you by forcing you to make something up in the damages column. The system is that cruel the documents virtually say we don't care about your sense of revenge or vindication.
This is all before you've left your own lawyers office.
Then you find out before you get to trial you have to sit through numerous attempts to settle the dispute for cash and no admissions which 90%? do. Then when it does not settle you are going to be there when the judge literally yells at the lawyers for not being able to settle it for cash and you are cluttering the system for some f'ed up reason (the parties principles "oh god").
All of the above is just from my John Grisham library. He is the best.