Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
They could come to an agreement, sure. But that's not Jack standing himself down.
The AFL isn't squeaky clean, but they are better at deflecting.
Still no examples then? You’re very sure of something that you can’t provide any examples of.
Your the one sprouting their would be evidence from NSW law cases and asking for examples. As you are sure to the contrary you provide one.
How am I supposed to provide an example of something I claim has not happened? As far as I know It hasn’t happened, no one has sued their employer after being stood down on full pay while criminal charges are resolved. I can’t give an example because it hasn’t happened.
He can potentially sue for loss of income, not talking about he’s monthly pay packet all the rest( if he is found innocent) because if you stand him down for 18months, not talking about a few weeks , 18 months, he can potentially claim that by standing him down for that period he has lost income, he is a current SOO player, with the likelihood of playing again so by not playing he misses out on $30k+ per game, he may have rep bonuses in he’s current contract, he can argue that he’s market value has suffered and he can take action against who stood him down NRL or Dragons, the Dragons want the NRL to make that call, if you were in the position and you potentially lost $200-$500k would you not seek legal advice, I would, and if you worked for the Dragons as part of your due diligence and duties would you not investigate the ramifications of your decision..
We should not compare cases BLM01. Every case is different mate. Last year only 17% of rape claims got a conviction against their perpetrator. The majority of women and men don't report it. I'm being careful about what I say here, but it's very difficult to prosecute a rape case. Cheers.
Please stop.
I agree as I was trying to say in all my posts every case is different and this JDB one is also different. Those comments were not comparing but replying to someone saying QUOTE - "If the prosecutor in charge gives a shit about their future career then they will have made damn sure they can justify their decision based on the evidence before them.saying they c=take cases on based on pretty much being sure of a guilty verdict" END OF QUOTE
We may have a different perspective here but it's definitely time to stop.
Man your inference reading is pretty bad. I said nothing to say they take cases being pretty sure of a guilty verdict. I said they think there is a reasonable chance of a guilty verdict, which is how they work dude. You said they take the side of the client, thinking that means the alleged victim, and would’ve just gone ahead no matter what. Which is wrong in almost every possible way. People have differing opinions and that’s cool, but some things have a factual basis and I think it’s important that’s spelled out.
Inference reading aye. I copied you words from your quote..LOL. I read your post again of 10.36pm last night. Nice one. I see you have now edited it. I'll excuse you for forgetting cause it was late at night.
That’s a lie. The first sentence you quote Up till the word them, I wrote, no problem - the second sentence you added before saying END OF QUOTE is entirely your invention. The post hasn’t been edited and is the same as when I posted. Doesn’t do your argument much good to lie like that friendo.
