Gary Gutful
Post Whore
- Messages
- 52,970
Never cared for what they sayWho cares because coaching doesn't matter right?? Nothing matters ffs!!
Never cared for BA's plays
Never cared for what they sayWho cares because coaching doesn't matter right?? Nothing matters ffs!!
Few of my positions are strongly held because there generally isn't enough information in rugby league to be too convinced of anything. In the case of Hodgson, he has his weaknesses, no different from most players. That includes Brendan Hands. But as Hands gets more experienced he will improve, and as Hodgson gets older and picks up more niggling injuries he will decline. Eventually Hands will overtake him. That's just inevitable. It won't be a matter of Arthur "finally admitting his mistake" or whatever bullshit narrative you try and spin.Pou will flip-flop his strongly held position within 30mins of Brad Arthur taking a decision to give Hands the start/majority minutes over Hodgson.
(And find/invent some stats to support his new position too - while arguing that he always thought Hands deserved to get the nod in front of Hodgson....)
Few of my positions are strongly held because there generally isn't enough information in rugby league to be too convinced of anything. In the case of Hodgson, he has his weaknesses, no different from most players. That includes Brendan Hands. But as Hands gets more experienced he will improve, and as Hodgson gets older and picks up more niggling injuries he will decline. Eventually Hands will overtake him. That's just inevitable. It won't be a matter of Arthur "finally admitting his mistake" or whatever bullshit narrative you try and spin.
Arthur wants the team to win as much as anyone, and he makes decisions with that in mind. He's already proven he isn't motivated by nepotism when he picked Hands on the bench over his son. That's just another occasion when he showed you know-alls are full of shit.
If Hodgson declined anymore he’d be dead.Few of my positions are strongly held because there generally isn't enough information in rugby league to be too convinced of anything. In the case of Hodgson, he has his weaknesses, no different from most players. That includes Brendan Hands. But as Hands gets more experienced he will improve, and as Hodgson gets older and picks up more niggling injuries he will decline. Eventually Hands will overtake him. That's just inevitable. It won't be a matter of Arthur "finally admitting his mistake" or whatever bullshit narrative you try and spin.
Arthur wants the team to win as much as anyone, and he makes decisions with that in mind. He's already proven he isn't motivated by nepotism when he picked Hands on the bench over his son. That's just another occasion when he showed you know-alls are full of shit.
It’s not that I’m right, it’s that you merkins are wrong to be so certain.You've developed a formula where your right no matter what happens. You could solve world peace
You missed your callling, you should have been a pollie. Your double speak is inspirational.It’s not that I’m right, it’s that you merkins are wrong to be so certain.
Hold no opinions.It’s not that I’m right, it’s that you merkins are wrong to be so certain.
I’ve got plenty of opinions and offer a great deal of insight if you can open your mind to receive it. What I don’t have is answers, just like you. However unlike you, I ask good questions. I’m actually surprised you claim to be in law, because a lawyer’s job isn’t to know things, it’s to assume they don’t know, and ask the right questions. You seem to lack that intellectual curiosity. You should take a leaf out of Gronk’s book. He is in his 60s and still wonders if he’s gay.Hold no opinions.
Offer no insight.
Wonk-speak.
As much as I want to argue, that is a well crafted response.I’ve got plenty of opinions and offer a great deal of insight if you can open your mind to receive it. What I don’t have is answers, just like you. However unlike you, I ask good questions. I’m actually surprised you claim to be in law, because a lawyer’s job isn’t to know things, it’s to assume they don’t know, and ask the right questions. You seem to lack that intellectual curiosity. You should take a leaf out of Gronk’s book. He is in his 60s and still wonders if he’s gay.
Who's gay?I’ve got plenty of opinions and offer a great deal of insight if you can open your mind to receive it. What I don’t have is answers, just like you. However unlike you, I ask good questions. I’m actually surprised you claim to be in law, because a lawyer’s job isn’t to know things, it’s to assume they don’t know, and ask the right questions. You seem to lack that intellectual curiosity. You should take a leaf out of Gronk’s book. He is in his 60s and still wonders if he’s gay.
Omg you've proven his nepotism doesn't exist over one selectionFew of my positions are strongly held because there generally isn't enough information in rugby league to be too convinced of anything. In the case of Hodgson, he has his weaknesses, no different from most players. That includes Brendan Hands. But as Hands gets more experienced he will improve, and as Hodgson gets older and picks up more niggling injuries he will decline. Eventually Hands will overtake him. That's just inevitable. It won't be a matter of Arthur "finally admitting his mistake" or whatever bullshit narrative you try and spin.
Arthur wants the team to win as much as anyone, and he makes decisions with that in mind. He's already proven he isn't motivated by nepotism when he picked Hands on the bench over his son. That's just another occasion when he showed you know-alls are full of shit.
Who's gay?
He fits the criteria for a BA assistant coach.Maybe he's lined up a non-playing coaching gig for next year... one can only hope!