News Josh Reynolds DV accusation (charges dropped 26/2/20)

[Wily Ole Dog]

Hah, yeah I couldn't figure out what that was at first but ultimately realised it was a dog.

Oops
I’ve always had an eye for blondes

 

[nick87]

That would make me the dominant lobster.

Boy that's a telling remark.

 

[T-Boon]

If, if, if.

Anything to defend the abuser, hey?

Go watch the Big Bash. You have lost it.

 

[Bazal]

Go watch the Big Bash. You have lost it.

Ok, lobster

 

[THE CHAMP]

LMAO I can't believe there are still crevice dwellers who reckon screaming in your partners' face that she's a "f**ken dog merkin" is normal.

You left out “while she is recording him on video”

 

[AnonymousLurker]

funny he is a fwit from what is shown but his claims in that rant of he breaking in can’t be used to defend him. I think both sides are wrong
does anyone know the full whole story ? Should judgements be made by media and others prior to this coming out at court and a verdict given
I think nrl media and fans are walking down a slippery slope

 

[Wizardman]

funny he is a fwit from what is shown but his claims in that rant of he breaking in can’t be used to defend him. I think both sides are wrong
does anyone know the full whole story ? Should judgements be made by media and others prior to this coming out at court and a verdict given
I think nrl media and fans are walking down a slippery slope

I seriously doubt she is without blame here. By virtue of the video being released, it is not good on her part to do so. By only a 30 sec video, we don't have a full context on what is truly going on. She knows to behave because she is videotaping. It is speculation as to how poorly she has behaved in all of this. She may be a totally innocent victim. She may be an absolute revenge seeking bitch. These sorts of incidents....the truth usually lies somewhere in the middle. However, there is no doubt that Reynolds is a total asshole for speaking to her in the way he did.

 

[THE CHAMP]

Love these threads, they really weed the dickheads out.

Yep it’s a dickheads vs pussies thread

 

[Wizardman]

You left out “while she is recording him on video”

Are you trying to justify his foul language because she is filming him? I don't even think he was aware of being filmed.

 

[Wily Ole Dog]

All this discussion raises an interesting question in this day and age.

Someone asked me this yesterday. Is it actually sexist to treat a woman differently to how you treat a male, or anyone else for that matter?
Even if it means treating them in a “nicer” way in a society that says we should all be equal

and before the usual hating trolls come along. It’s a question not my opinion

 

[myrrh ken]

Jesus the battlelines drawn here. Lots of judgment and conclusions.

Hope you blokes arent on the jury

 

[Timmay]

Hope you blokes arent on the jury

There won't be a jury.

It'll be a one-day defended ADVO hearing in front of a Magistrate at the Local Court.

 

[myrrh ken]

There won't be a jury.

It'll be a one-day defended ADVO hearing in front of a Magistrate at the Local Court.

Well i wish people reserve judgment until a version of the facts are known.

The vid is already getting the result intended from its release on this forum alone.

 

[T-Boon]

All this discussion raises an interesting question in this day and age.

Someone asked me this yesterday. Is it actually sexist to treat a woman differently to how you treat a male, or anyone else for that matter?
Even if it means treating them in a “nicer” way in a society that says we should all be equal

and before the usual hating trolls come along. It’s a question not my opinion

It is an interesting question that we aren't mature enough to debate here.

 

[Timmah]

Well i wish people reserve judgment until a version of the facts are known.

The vid is already getting the result intended from its release on this forum alone.

Really? I see most people in this thread either attacking or defending Reynolds' actions in this video.

A very small number of people appear to be labelling one person or the other guilty but most are just talking about Reynolds' conduct in the video, and whether it was 'normal' or 'appropriate'.

Looks like some can't separate out that discussion from the larger one though.

 

[franklin2323]

It is an interesting question that we aren't mature enough to debate here.

Sadly true

 

[myrrh ken]

Really? I see most people in this thread either attacking or defending Reynolds' actions in this video.

A very small number of people appear to be labelling one person or the other guilty but most are just talking about Reynolds' conduct in the video, and whether it was 'normal' or 'appropriate'.

Looks like some can't separate out that discussion from the larger one though.

Not just guilt of dv but guilt of "unacceptable" behaviour.

It is foolish to pass judgment without the facts and deal in absolutes.

The vid was released for people to make judgments of his character. Its obviously part of the dv case so no it cant be separated

 

[Timmah]

Not just guilt of dv but guilt of "unacceptable" behaviour.

It is foolish to pass judgment without the facts and deal in absolutes.

The vid was released for people to make judgments of his character. Its obviously part of the dv case so no it cant be separated

DV is a crime, a bit different to being "guilty" of unacceptable behaviour".

 

[myrrh ken]

DV is a crime, a bit different to being "guilty" of unacceptable behaviour".

No shit. So why pass judgment ob the vid?

 

[Timmah]

No shit. So why pass judgment ob the vid?

Because the conduct in it is shithouse.

You can chew gum and walk at the same time.