The Rosco
Bench
- Messages
- 2,909
Some of you guys have no idea regarding reality. You know what a recovery date is - its an estimate which is a prediction of the future.
I can't be bothered discussing this anymore as its pointless. Lets just hope that we get a better run with injuries and the team wins more than their fair share of games.
. . Sure it's an estimate, but an estimate based on those doctors seeing hundreds of the same injury over time. Then using that repeated experience to say that injury X takes 6 weeks till they can run on it, and another 2-3 weeks till they can play.
We know that a broken leg will heal in 8 weeks coz there have been thousands of broken legs and that's how long they take.
The problem with some of the WT past injuries is that they should only be a 3 week injury, and because of poor practise/ dud recovery staff/etc, the injury goes from 3 weeks, to 4, to 6, etc, etc.
I lost count of the times Moussa changed his story on player injuries on his weekly interview on the WT website.:lol:
First saying it's a routine sprain that will take 2 weeks. Then at 3 weeks it becomes a high syndismosis, which needs a different treatment regime.
Then at 5 weeks it becomes a difficult ligament retraction issue ( or some other bullshit term), then again . . .oops, new treatment needed.
I spoke to Paterson at training when he had the hand injury. At that stage, he had been out for around 3 -4 weeks, IIRC. He was frustrated that what was originally diagnosed as a simple sprain ended up as well over a month on the sidelines. He mentioned the many different paths of treatment.
Only God knows what really happened with the Tank's ankle.
And how ironic that the NRL is releasing a "report card" on each team's ability to manage injuries. No points for guessing who would come stone motherless in that list !!!