- Messages
- 8,677
He got hit with grade 3, the maximum. 3 weeks is because he's a clean skin and if he pleas early. Do you think it deserved to be sent to the judiciary?Three weeks? After the NRL's recent history with the results of dangerous throws gone wrong? Fair dinkum.
100%. He lost his feet and drove him into the ground, head first.He got hit with grade 3, the maximum. 3 weeks is because he's a clean skin and if he pleas early. Do you think it deserved to be sent to the judiciary?
It's a driving tackle gone wrong. Go look at the spears inglis copped from inu and fa'aoso. Much different type of tackle imo.100%. He lost his feet and drove him into the ground, head first.
It's a driving tackle gone wrong. Go look at the spears inglis copped from inu and fa'aoso. Much different type of tackle imo.
If you wanna argue the suspension for dangerous throws needs to be higher fair enough. But cotrics is in line with what others have got.
Should have gone to the tribunal and let them decide. What's it going to take for these tackles to be dealt with harshly? 3-4 weeks is a slap on the wrist, it's a blind miracle the bloke walked away not hurt.
A broken neckShould have gone to the tribunal and let them decide. What's it going to take for these tackles to be dealt with harshly? 3-4 weeks is a slap on the wrist, it's a blind miracle the bloke walked away not hurt.
NRL continues to be laughable...
3-4 weeks for that if an utter disgrace, should have been sent directly to the tribunal.
Tribunal?Should have gone to the tribunal and let them decide. What's it going to take for these tackles to be dealt with harshly? 3-4 weeks is a slap on the wrist, it's a blind miracle the bloke walked away not hurt.
Knight annoys me, should've been sin binned.