Who would represent Perth?Not if Perth own the license or a majority
Perth business guys 80 percentWho would represent Perth?
The only bid we know of is the consortium run by Cumins.
How can Cumins' consortium and the Bears work together after the comments he made to the press?
The WA Gov said they will not own or run the team.
That leaves NRLWA, which is owned by the ARLC.
Does the ARLC want the burden of having a stake in an NRL club?
It could happen, but I'll believe it when I see it.Perth business guys 80 percent
North Sydney 20 percent
Bears will need to show a lot more than they have so far.Perth business guys 80 percent
North Sydney 20 percent
Bears will need to show a lot more than they have so far.
if cumins has got the mOney behind him then Perth will be in, bears or no bears. Without Perth the bears will be forever more a feeder club to other nrl clubs.
so far I haven’t seen them offer anything concrete more than a perth club could get by partnering with a myriad of other second tier clubs,
if they want 20% ownership then they can pony up $10 mill to help with start up costs.
They have resources. But don't ask any more questions about that. It's just resources ok!Bears will need to show a lot more than they have so far.
if cumins has got the mOney behind him then Perth will be in, bears or no bears. Without Perth the bears will be forever more a feeder club to other nrl clubs.
so far I haven’t seen them offer anything concrete more than a perth club could get by partnering with a myriad of other second tier clubs,
if they want 20% ownership then they can pony up $10 mill to help with start up costs.
Unfortunately they can't have that name anymore. The name 'Perth Reds' now belongs to a volleyball club.Bring back Perth Reds, send the Bears to PNG
Perth need the Bears, imagine if another strain of Covid hit and you shut your whole State down again because of a little cold lol.Bears will need to show a lot more than they have so far.
if cumins has got the mOney behind him then Perth will be in, bears or no bears. Without Perth the bears will be forever more a feeder club to other nrl clubs.
so far I haven’t seen them offer anything concrete more than a perth club could get by partnering with a myriad of other second tier clubs,
if they want 20% ownership then they can pony up $10 mill to help with start up costs.
Peter Cumins’ comments were made on Saturday this is no doubt V’Landys response to those comments.A few meetings between V'landys and Cook doesn't mean Perth is guaranteed a licence. The fact V'landys is still pushing for "Perth Bears", despite Cumins wanting a team for years, and only after PNG has been admitted, isn't a ringing endorsement for Perth.
Peter Cumins' comments about Western Australians not accepting a team from Sydney that plays games at NSO could hurt Perth's chances of getting a team. If I was the Bears I wouldn't want to deal with Cumins' consortium after he basically said they doesn't want anything to do with a Sydney club.
It's a bit rich for a pawnbroker to turn his nose up at a team from the second tier of NSW being relocated to Perth. He's made a living selling secondhand products to people around the world, yet he will only accept a "brand new" team for Perth?
What are the odds of both parties agreeing to join forces?Cumins’ comments were made on Saturday this is no doubt V’Landys response to those comments.
You forgot South Island Bears..It could happen, but I'll believe it when I see it.
Both sides will need to make significant concessions for it to work.
I remember when the media were all in on the Perth Bears as the 18th team. That turned out to be wrong and ended up being replaced with articles about the Bears siding with Pasifika and PNG. Around 7 or 8 years ago we had the media going into over drive about the Gold Coast Bears replacing the Gold Coast Titans. At one stage we had the media saying the next three teams would be PNG, North Sydney and Newtown.
I seeCumins’ comments were made on Saturday this is no doubt V’Landys response to those comments.
South Island Bears is better than Perth Bears. Colour scheme suits the Christchurch market.You forgot South Island Bears..
The trouble is that the Bears want games played there... the South Island and NZ need more games, not less.South Island Bears is better than Perth Bears. Colour scheme suits the Christchurch market.
... and get rid of (most of, if not all of) their non-negotiables.Nobody wants the Bears, PNG said no, Perth said no, you think Christchurch want them? Theres only stuck in the 80's Vlandys and an out of touch PM that does lol
Maybe they should take the hint and change their arrogant approach?
@Centy Coast has been talking about the bears making a lot of concessionsIt could happen, but I'll believe it when I see it.
Both sides will need to make significant concessions for it to work.
I remember when the media were all in on the Perth Bears as the 18th team. That turned out to be wrong and ended up being replaced with articles about the Bears siding with Pasifika and PNG. Around 7 or 8 years ago we had the media going into over drive about the Gold Coast Bears replacing the Gold Coast Titans. At one stage we had the media saying the next three teams would be PNG, North Sydney and Newtown.
Out of interested why do you think that? Do you think more people in Sydney and Brisbane will tune in to watch the Perth Bears than the WC Pirates? What makes you think that once the first year novelty has worn off? I dont see any major Sydney uplift in tv audience when the sharks or manly play v when Melbourne or Brisbane play?Perth pirates = no value for broadcasters
Perth bears = genuine value for broadcasters