What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Karmichael Hunt Out

Status
Not open for further replies.

millersnose

Post Whore
Messages
65,223
Dean Moriarty said:
Sutho Sharks, quote directly or don't quote at all:

Member's Guidelines said:
EDITING OTHER PEOPLE'S POSTS
Every member has the option to quote other member's posts when making a reply. Please note that posts which edit another person's post (by way of the quote function) will be deleted.

Reefy, if you want to sort something out with Sutho Sharks, take it to the hot dog stand where all these feuds should be resolved. 8)

hey the hot dog stand is my intellectual property

whatch out or your account will be renamed "strong latte"
 

Sutho_Sharks

Juniors
Messages
815
I will fix it up, only because a moderator has told me to. I put 'words to the effect of' which is a proper and correct way of saying what someone said without actually directly quoting, but nevertheless it has been fixed and in addition to this, referenced!

One would think this insolent school child would be out playing rugby League, instead of commenting on it & challenging the likes of us old ex-players.
But maybe he is too much of a whimp?

This is signature breaks the guidlines, BTR change it or I will be forced to take action, its very hypocritical of you.
 

Frenzy.

Post Whore
Messages
53,863
Sutho_Sharks said:
I will fix it up, only because a moderator has told me to. I put 'words to the effect of' which is a proper and correct way of saying what someone said without actually directly quoting, but nevertheless it has been fixed and in addition to this, referenced!

For you sake BTR and to highlight to the moderators, BTR has violated the following:

The crux of the matter...
DELETING THREADS / POSTS / WORDS / IMAGES
Members are asked to hold their discussions in a rational and mature manner. Any posts which abuse membership privileges will be deleted.
These include posts which are:
• Excessively abusive,
• Excessively obscene,
• Excessively vulgar,
• Slanderous or defaming,
• Excessively hateful or racist,
• Personally threatening,
• Excessively sexually-oriented,
or any other material that may be in violation of any applicable laws.

If required, I will quote BTR in undertaking in ALL acts highlighted in bold, some of which have even been shown in this very thread.

Also shown in this thread by BTR in the clearest of clear cut cases:

TAKING THE LAW INTO YOUR OWN HANDS
Sometimes members can't help themselves and feel it necessary to go on a rampage in an attempt to mould the forums into their own 'oasis'.
Please note that Admin take a dim view of members who feel they are the 'forum cop' and try to represent themselves as such. The proper channel for complaints is through a Mod or an Admin via private message (PM), who will then deal with the query.

The Legal stuff...
DEFAMATION AND NAMING NAMES
Implicating a person or persons by way of naming names is forbidden.
In this regard, we refer to spreading unfounded rumours, innuendo or over speculation.
It also refers to repeating private conversations, or something that your 'Dad's mate heard down at the pub'

What we really hate...
MEMBERS ATTACKING OTHER MEMBERS The vast majority of members join forums to have reasonable and good humoured discussions. However, there are a minority who try to stand out from the crowd by attacking other members.

If one member is being excessively abusive to another member, then deletions of post(s) may be warranted. These are posts which are personally offensive or excessive or by accepted description, are personally threatening.

Additionally, any posts which vilify or aggressively single out another member will be deleted.


When I look at it, BTR & Co breach nearly every guidline!

I take it Dean Moriarty that BTR will also be reprimanded for his actions, we wouldnt want to be one sided now would we?

sutho sharks = pot

reefyshark = kettle

lez call it a draw!
 

Sutho_Sharks

Juniors
Messages
815
Im quite fine, but it isnt the smartest thing to draw attention to someone elses faults when you yourself aernt a little angel is it?
 

Frenzy.

Post Whore
Messages
53,863
Sutho_Sharks said:
Im quite fine, but it isnt the smartest thing to draw attention to someone elses faults when you yourself aernt a little angel is it?

sutho sharks = pot

reefy = kettle

reefy one up now
 
Messages
16,050
Sutho Shark,

The "Guidelines" are being broken by a lot of posters on this forum every day of the week.

It seems the "Guidelines" only apply to certain people.

If a moderator pulled you up it's probably because he drinks with BTR on Beer Hill.

If your signature has been the worst thing written on this forum and the only thing pulled up in these past few weeks then that is just a big joke.

Some of the abusive threatening posts coming out of his camp this week have been some of the lowest stuff you'd ever read.

But hey they aren't breaking the "Guidelines" ???

You'll just have to take the extra knocks on the chin and just ignore some of the crap that gets sent your way.

Keep up the fight against bullying.
 

blacktip-reefy

Immortal
Messages
34,076
I am more than aware that I skate close to the rules & have had numerous warnings of which I am happy to post.

If you want to take me on, stick to the rules.

& only a person who thinks peachey should have retired last year, could think that Beer hill has 50 moderators srinking there with me. Especially when Im a lableed "foxtel fan".

goose.
 

blacktip-reefy

Immortal
Messages
34,076
& I actually have been warned By willow for posting negative comments about a forum moderator.

I am sure I am not a favourite of that mod & his associate. Could not imagine a beer happening there.
 

Frenzy.

Post Whore
Messages
53,863
What does the phrase "pot calling the kettle black" mean?

Answer

It takes one to know one. I mean that's what it means , I wasn't calling you a pot. The kettle could answer, "Look who's talking." It goes way back to when cooking was done over fires. If the pot and kettle weren't already black cast iron when new they were soon black from the soot and smoke. The black has nothing to do with 'evil' or race. Usually though, there is a connotation of criticism in both the use of "black" and in the entire phrase. The pot is being hypocritical , criticising the kettle for a quality or action or something that the pot itself has. It's not as strong as Jesus' "log in the eye" analogy, where the critcizer has a bigger flaw than the criticized . If you wanta analyze it a bit more, you could move forward in time to when pots were still cast iron but kettles were being made of tin or other 'white' metals. Then the pot is criticising the kettle for becoming something the pot has always been. Or... the pot was black but the kettle shiny, the pot sees its own reflection in the shiny surface of the kettle and claims that the kettle, not it, was black. But the saying goes back to before white shiny kettles . If someone who spends all day answering questions here in the bag critcizes someone else who spends all day answering questions ( ahem) by saying " you have too much time on your hands," then the pot is calling the kettle black.
 

NRH

Juniors
Messages
73
Another thread undermined by Reefys incompetence and pure lack of football knowledge. Must you always derail topics into slanging matches? Just keep to yourself you are disturbing the Shire locals.
 

wittyfan

Immortal
Messages
30,071
Your signature is very prophetic, NRH! :lol:

I thought DS was the only doomsdayer on here.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top