Answer the question numb nuts ! If they sack him today you're cool with that or if they let him run out his contract you're Ok with that too ?
It's not like I've got any control over it either way, is it?
If the public vote the current board out with Poupou commend that decision because those who know best make that decision.
That's the main problem with democracy - those who make the big decisions (voters) generally don't know best.
But the board were voted in. That's the reality. And if they care more about being re-elected than anything else they will certainly punt Kearney soon if we don't start winning games.
That's just how it goes. I couldn't be bothered becoming a voting member again because club politics is just a sad thing to be interested in.
and if we are sitting in hte same position this time next year? He stays until end of 2013?
This is the point you f**ken nitwits don't get -
IT IS NOT OUR CALL TO MAKE.
We're not privy to what goes on behind the scenes so it's stupid to think we can judge. We can only see the players - whether they're doing their job or not - we can't see coaches at work well enough to judge them.
Pou doesn't know if he's Arthur or Martha most of the time. One day he's 100% behind whatever the Board says, the next he's taking bets each way.
How's 1 from 10 grab you Pou ?
I've changed my mind about how good our players are. The older ones have declined massively - they're no longer performing every week.
The team unity evident last year is also gone, and to find an explanation for that you either have to look at the new blokes in the club, or have a look at who is on his way out.
Honestly, we are going so bad that I reckon if Kearney was the problem he would be gone already.
With all the people supporting Kearney, from board to sponsor to media heads, he can't be the problem.
Unfortunately we wanted the leaks stopped and now they have. Although if there were big issues inside the squad you'd think more leaks would have come out about that.
