So we do that and wait until Round 12 2025 and his form is unchanged. Do we then extend him for two more years? Bcs we do need a proven spine utility - with ZERO INJURY PROBLEMS - with more than 50 games. Every NRL team needs one.
But let's say Kyle's form drops off by Round 12, so we look around the market. We identify someone currently at another club. The contract situation for that player will be either
1. He is at end of contract and available for 2026
2. He will become available for offers for 2027 only after Nov 1.
In case 1, who is this player? Why does his current club not want him for 2026?
In case 2, who plays the spine utility role for 2026 while we wait for this player to join us in 2027, asuming we get his signature?
All this is so uncertain while we need someone for 2026, he knows the systems and, in my view, is a good spine utility footballer.
Signing Kyle now is a perfectly reasonable action.
K F to me is solid nothing more nothing less.
Better than some of what we had but that wasn't great and like so much in this place had over inflated tires.
He is now in our roster for 3 years and if he is only a back up then that seems absurd to me.
If he is genuinely to be a starting player over the 2 year extension period then which spot is it going to be?
Can't see him beating out Cook or Liddle nor can I see him beating out LI or D A for the 6 & 7 jerseys.
So that means the recruitment team are convinced that noone better is a possibility to be with us before the start of the 2028 season.
Such vision on their part.
And some people, who openly dislike the coach, don't wish to recognise the overall improvement across all facets of our club.
Instead they choose to look for opportunities to deride the coach.
They particularly don't like other people celebrating or enjoying watching the club rise from obscurity
You sound like "The Grinch"
Ridiculous conclusion on your part.
You are making a connection between coach and player and I am not.
I am making a connection between our recruitment / retention team and a player that I believe is being over valued and I don't mean in $$$ terms.
As I said above he is now in our roster for 3 years so the belief is that noone better is available to us before 2028 and simply put I think that is stupid.
If he proved to be a game breaker in the 1st half of 2025 then I would applaud the decision to extend him.
In fact if they had of extended him for 1 year with an option in our favour I would have thought that prudent.
Maybe he should change his name to Kyle Griffin. Will that make you a tad happier??
So you are just another fool that thinks a comment questioning a decision is automatically a shot at the coach and of course that is blasphemy.
By waiting to see what he now brings to the table in his own right means we make a nuanced decision but by signing him prematurely we tie up a top 30 roster position for 3 years regardless of what he brings / doesn't bring to the table and we already have a few of those that are crippling us for now.
But of course those that think that the sun shines out of S F's arse will go along with anything and if any reasonable argument about anything is put forward you'll instantly jump to his defence.
As I said above a 1 year extension with an option our way would have been perfectly reasonable but evidently no one of K F ability is coming into our ranks before 2028 at the earliest.