Hope GI is fit to go late next season after a refresh of mind and body
How many merkins here own a house in Sydney? The market values that house at a ridiculously inflated price. That is what people are willing to pay for that house. That is market value.
Dear me. Are you intentionally sounding stupid, or is that as good as it gets for you ?Yes, it’s a moronic contention from those pushing it.
Latrell has got his market value from a legitimate source
. . . That's my new boat over there.
The trouble with all this market value is Tigers and Roosters pulled their offers, so can you really take them into account? He had to get whatever he could because he was left with nothing else supposedly
What do you say his market value is?
Dear me. Are you intentionally sounding stupid, or is that as good as it gets for you ?
Market value is basically the price that the market will pay. If someone wants to pay massive overs . . . at the time of the massive overs purchase . . THAT IS THE MARKET VALUE.
If you want to pay 50% less than the highest offer, market value is the highest offer, not yours.
In the case of houses and valuations . . . there is a world of difference between the word " valuation" and "market value". I value your lean to @ $1000. The rich bloke from the next town desperately wants to move into your neighbourhood and is prepared to pay $2000.
Can you work out which price is market value ?
It's ironic that you use words like moronic.
. . . That's my new boat over there.
Umm, how do I put this without sounding condescending . . . .Glad you raised the boat issue Rosco.
maybe now we can discuss other dodgy deals by all you other clubs.
IF you perceive this Mitchell deal as dodgy, be an agile an self evaluate your own past deals
I know you won’t as it’s clearly easier for an “educated” person like yourself just to call others “stupid”
It depends on which club you ask.The trouble with all this market value is Tigers and Roosters pulled their offers, so can you really take them into account? He had to get whatever he could because he was left with nothing else supposedly
What do you say his market value is?
So Souths are allowed to medically clear Sam Burgess from their salary cap, under extremely dubious circumstances which is basically tantamount to NRL endorsed salary cap cheating, and with the free salary cap space, they've been allowed to sign one of the best young players in the game on a deal well below what other clubs were offering (ie. his market) but the Raiders cant sign Jordan Rapana, a 30 year old, injury prone winger, to a mutually agreeable deal IF he finishes up his Japanese Rugby season fit and healthy and willing to play because it might not be market value... not that they'd know since they've already rejected it without even know what the Raiders offer would be, or what other clubs are willing to offer
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm..........
Now, on to your " be an agile an self evaluate your own past deals"
Could we please see that in English ?
So let me get this straight.market value does not include one moronic, unrealistic offer. Eg, west’s offer
Market value is basically the price that the market will pay.
/QUOTE]
That's not how the nrl determines market value.
F**k off.We do not pretend to be the peoples club, sticking up for the little bloke.
Never pretended that once.
You lied then sold out.
We are still a club, look it up.
Should have merged with Saints......pfft the peoples sell outs.
Did you march in the street so rich men own you...
We are still a club, look it up.
Not suprised you live in denial. Your entire entity, sold out.