“I know I played a bad game but it’s like I can’t play good every game,” Mitchell said of his Origin I performance.
More than the shoulder chip, more than the victim mentality - here's why he's struggling to close the million dollar deal he wants.
I'd be very surprised if your Tedesco, Slater, Inglis, Minichiello, Lockyer level players would ever publicly state "cant play good every game" with seeming indifference.
Webster's next paragraph sums up the situation, and explains why Roosters pulled their offer.
For instance, if he is going to reject a healthy offer of $2.4 million from his employer, it’s probably best to have another firm offer on the table elsewhere. Otherwise, you are playing poker with a really bad hand.
LM is sooking about the pulled offer, but why would Easts leave it on the table to be used as a bargaining chip against them.
Roosters leave the 800k offer on the table, LM shops around and gets 900k, comes back and asks Roosters for 1M. This is obviously how he thought this would play it.
Reality: Roosters pull the offer, LM shops around and other clubs have no baseline offer to compete with, LM might have to come back and ask for the 800 again. Advantage Roosters.