some11
Referee
- Messages
- 23,675
Well, loyalty to over the hill players at least.Loyalty doesn't win comps
Well, loyalty to over the hill players at least.Loyalty doesn't win comps
Just stating facts no dummy spit here.Now now, Call mummy to pick up the toys you just threw out of the cot
It came from a Rooster.Just stating facts no dummy spit here.
1. Souths treated differently
2. Souths are scabs.
Prove the statement wrong.
Ha you wish.It came from a Rooster.
Job done.
Somewhat off topic, but Souths pursuit of Latrell is being put on hold because they're desperate to get Jai Arrow released a year early for 2020.
I read this morning that Souths are looking at a transfer fee and player swap as part of the deal.
But my question is: shouldn't any "monetary transfer fee" count under the salary cap?
Souths, despite their laughable "battlers" tag, would be arguably the wealthiest club in Sydney; so if transfer fees don't count under the cap then what is to stop richer clubs offering "the battlers" large sums of money to release their best players early?
It sounds like just another way for the cap to be circumvented.
Yeah even Titans aren't silly enough to trade Arrow for some rejects from Souffs bench
That’s says a lot about your lack of football knowledge or how bad the 13 teams below us last year were
take your pick
Yeah im not a big fan of the Sydney rorters, but 1 & 2 are factually plausable to me, A.1909 GF should never be counted as there was no opposition, and B. GI & Sammy medically retired what utter rorting, i didn't see peter wallace or sam mckendry get any kickbacks off of their medical retirements, souffs are treated differently, might be coz of Packer Jr? or does Rusty pull ears in HQJust stating facts no dummy spit here.
1. Souths treated differently
2. Souths are scabs.
Prove the statement wrong.
Yeah im not a big fan of the Sydney rorters, but 1 & 2 are factually plausable to me, A.1909 GF should never be counted as there was no opposition, and B. GI & Sammy medically retired what utter rorting, i didn't see peter wallace or sam mckendry get any kickbacks off of their medical retirements, souffs are treated differently, might be coz of Packer Jr? or does Rusty pull ears in HQ
Yeah im not a big fan of the Sydney rorters, but 1 & 2 are factually plausable to me, A.1909 GF should never be counted as there was no opposition, and B. GI & Sammy medically retired what utter rorting, i didn't see peter wallace or sam mckendry get any kickbacks off of their medical retirements, souffs are treated differently, might be coz of Packer Jr? or does Rusty pull ears in HQ
Perhaps they did?Perhaps the panthers should have applied for it?
Yeah im not a big fan of the Sydney rorters, but 1 & 2 are factually plausable to me, A.1909 GF should never be counted as there was no opposition, and B. GI & Sammy medically retired what utter rorting, i didn't see peter wallace or sam mckendry get any kickbacks off of their medical retirements, souffs are treated differently, might be coz of Packer Jr? or does Rusty pull ears in HQ
The ruling is similar to the way the NRL treated Peter Wallace's decision to retire last season and take up a coaching role at Penrith.
Or perhaps they did... It was approved and Peter Wallace took up a coaching role with the Panthers immediately while his remaining salary was removed from the cap which is what actually happened...
It’s good to see the chooks going through a bit of adversity. Christ I know how it feels fellas so suck it up.