Hutty1986
Immortal
- Messages
- 34,034
your not blood related to your wife are you? haw haw
Blabber.
your not blood related to your wife are you? haw haw
You're missing the point.
The referee called "Release". JWH did not release.
Penalty was then the only option.
The difference is that every NRL player has a head, while only a select few have long hair, which puts them at an advantageous position to gain penalties.
No it is a joke and OHS laws should ban long hair from contact sport.
No it is a joke and OHS laws should ban long hair from contact sport.
Players should be given 50 bucks for a decent hair yank on this twit, roots and all.Lets make it clear...
I don't have an issue with long hair in general (ala Hindmarsh) but when it prevents an effective tackle from being made by drooping down the shoulders, that's when something should be done cause it will lead to penalties.
Lots of tackles are made from pulling a player down from behind especially a fast back like Idris, so when tackling the shoulders are taken out of contention that effectively gives him a massive advantage.
Imagine trying to tackle that without touching his hair in some way, shape or form?
Who's Albert Kunglfeld?Nice thread Albert Kunglfeld
Players should be given 50 bucks for a decent hair yank on this twit, roots and all.
View attachment 76088
Another one for the ignore listNice thread Albert Kunglfeld