AlwaysGreen
Post Whore
- Messages
- 50,155
:crazy:The difference is that every NRL player has a head.
:crazy:The difference is that every NRL player has a head.
Agreed, ban short players too, little fu^%kers have a good chance of pulling penalties for a high shot, tall players have to go as well to be fair, some of the chins on these blokes have me concerned too - not fair on anyone with big shoulders trying to get under them to make a tackle.
The difference is that every NRL player has a head, while only a select few have long hair, which puts them at an advantageous position to gain penalties.
That is funnyWell no there should be no rule.
There should however be some pride in being a man.
Pig tails are for females (little girls), man the f**k up.
Yeah, players shouldn't be allowed to have long hair because they look like girls.
Also players shouldn't be allowed to shave because only young boys and women have no beards.
No players shouldnt have long hair then whinge when opposition players try and pull on it.
Its their choice if they want to look like little school girls playing hopscotch with pig tails (Idris)
No players shouldnt have long hair then whinge when opposition players try and pull on it.
Its their choice if they want to look like little school girls playing hopscotch with pig tails (Idris)
The majority of players look like little school girls because they have no beards.
How unmanly does Brad Meyers look now compared to before?
I'd say the bigger turning point was JWH getting penalized for "holding on" after chopping down I believe Paea near half way around the legs, despite the new rules reading:
Dogs scored off the ensuing set to go in at half time up by 2 instead of down by 4