Parra
Referee
- Messages
- 24,900
Yeah imagine wanting the coach of my club to do well.
You make excuses for his poor form. Imagine that winning matters.
Yeah imagine wanting the coach of my club to do well.
Anyone for a latte?
Kearney and the team doing well would upset plenty in here it seems, some great fans we have on here :roll:
You make excuses for his poor form.
So he has a 3 yr plan also????? :crazy:But but but they just want the club to do well!!!
They just don't want that to happen until Kearney, Ossie and the board are gone.
Whether he wins the comp in his first season or runs last it's got little to do with the coach.
You are completely wrong.
It has everything to do with the coach.
But but but they just want the club to do well!!!
They just don't want that to happen until Kearney, Ossie and the board are gone.
That must be why everyone's falling over each other to offer Hagan and Stuart jobs at NRL clubs. :roll:
Really? Please name one forummer that has posted that view...But but but they just want the club to do well!!!
They just don't want that to happen until Kearney, Ossie and the board are gone.
That must be why everyone's falling over each other to offer Hagan and Stuart jobs at NRL clubs.
As if you'd know what offers anyone gets.:lol:
But what if the majority don't agree with what you want, are you prepared to accept the majority decision?Let's say we come last.
Either Kearney is sacked. Or the bloke who fails to sack him is gone.
The buck has to stop somewhere.
Let's say we come last.
Either Kearney is sacked. Or the bloke who fails to sack him is gone.
The buck has to stop somewhere.
Really? Please name one forummer that has posted that view...
I've seen a few post their opinion that they fear it won't happen under Kearney, and/or Ossie and Board.... but that's very different to not wanting it to.
Personally i have my doubts about Kearney being the type of guy that can coach a club to a premiership in his current contract
and think Ossie and the Board aren't immune to having failings (but they and their distant predecessors were largely irrelevant week to week on our results).
But I can't understand why you'd want to misrepresent the opinions of forummers who don't happen to agree with you, rather than just state your (equally valid) differeing opinion and let discussion continue?
But what if the majority don't agree with what you want, are you prepared to accept the majority decision?
That is the best you've got to justify failure?
Let's say we come last.
Either Kearney is sacked. Or the bloke who fails to sack him is gone.
The buck has to stop somewhere.
What are you on about?
Hagan and Stuart won premierships in their first season, but still aren't considered good enough to coach first grade. It's pretty self-explanatory.