Doesn’t matter now, it didn’t work. This new model (if it is new) has been implemented by a few clubs now?
Walters has spoken about it re Bronco’s, is an example?
The dogs seem to be following our old way, will be interesting how they go in the next few years?
I didn’t know that ..
With the spoon and the once in a generation embarrassment that was Seibold, the Broncos hierarchy are now terrified of allowing any coach sole responsibility for recruitment (who could blame them) even more terrified than WT (and who could blame them) - at least unlike WT, the Broncos got rid of Siebold when it went beyond a joke
You’d have to be blind Freddy to not see how the “old way” with Trent Barrett given full responsibility with recruitment at Canterbury is going - Bloody fabulous. He had at least proven he can get results as an assistant coach at Penrith . He was getting great feedback from sort after players etc etc Therefore the Dogs decided to trust Barrett (as any worthy gamble needs) - oh and he WOULD have demanded sole recruitment responsibility.
As the Hassler says you can’t let the minority of occurrences eg Cleary dictate your policy or change the winning formula..You have to pick your coach that ticks the box’s and take the gamble …5 people with 5 different views and strategy’s, has never or very seldom imo, come up with one good result, on a rugby league field.
There’s got to be Nothing worse for a coach than having to deal with players they know are bad choices, or they just have no faith in, and also knowing THEIR neck’s on the line. Some coaches have no choice though due to their apparent lack of effectiveness/ good results, and their poor choices in the past. I would think they would be resentful and angry about it and maybe end up going through the motions to some degree. But also knowing that the family holidays, and kids private schooling are paid for, and the missus is happy.