With Dufty and Mann on our right, at least the ball will actually get to the winger.
Nighty’s try on the weekend was actually a decent backline movement.
No. Rather, I place no value at all on a poll conducted surveying an audience of people who don't get football. Numbers aside.lol, lol, lol lol lol.
So according to you. Only you and one other person who bothered to vote on this topic have any idea and everyone else has no idea. lol lol lol. You are a very funny guy. lol
I actually said Aitken had 3 years to show what he has got.Frank Facer said; "Mann had 3 years to show what he had got. I would rather give Mann and Lomax 40 minutes each..."
I don't disagree with this comment and understand comments about his defence, but I just wouldn't write Aitken off. For one he's still only very young (22) Was playing when we led the comp last year, and is IMO a very powerful runner. He has upsides. My preference is for Mann in round 1 but feel Aitken should also get a shot in the trials as Im not fussed who wins or by what margin I just want the best combinations for round 1. not against rotating the 4 options and as I disagree with some who've stated that we have good quality depth in the centres. I've yet to see enough consistency for 26 or 25 rounds from any of them to convince me we have an abundance of NRL quality centres, hopefully this is sorted this year
What do you think Mann needs to improve on to be an NRL quality right centre?No. Rather, I place no value at all on a poll conducted surveying an audience of people who don't get football. Numbers aside.
lol. Now the poll is 70 to 2. lolNo. Rather, I place no value at all on a poll conducted surveying an audience of people who don't get football. Numbers aside.
Things that stats don't show.What do you think Mann needs to improve on to be an NRL quality right centre?
lol. Now the poll is 70 to 2. lol
Did you vote twice? lol
Should have gone to spec savers. lol
I can't believe this thread to be honest.
Mann starts in a trial game, as Euie wants less minutes coming back.
People read into it and all of a sudden Mann is a certain starter? haha. Please.
Euan is a real chance of playing Origin. Get with it.[/QUOTE
BS
I could not recall Aitken running any holes, so I look up his highlights reel on Youtube. There was one occasion that Aikten hit a hole and that was from 5 meters out, when the Newcastle defence was at 6's and 7's and the centre came in and left a gaping hole that anyone could have ran into and scored.Things that stats don't show.
He's a bit too stop/start in good ball. Doesn't help our momentum. He's a bit slight for a right centre.
Competes well though. Aitken is far more dangerous running a hole or breaking a tackle on the line. He's also more equipped physically to handle tough carries out of our end.
Don't get me wrong, Mann is an alright footy player, just depends on the emergence of Field as to whether he can snag a spot on the bench or not.
I could not recall Aitken running any holes, so I look up his highlights reel on Youtube. There was one occasion that Aikten hit a hole and that was from 5 meters out, when the Newcastle defence was at 6's and 7's and the centre came in and left a gaping hole that anyone could have ran into and scored.
The rest of his highlights were basically Aitken getting the ball around 10 metres out from the try line when we were on the attack and a powerful run to get the ball over the try line or scoring from a short kick put through by a half.
If you think that Aitken is a good centre, then your footy IQ is too low for zero.
You should have gone to Spec Savers.
Why do you bother explaining it to him?It's a lot more than that. Aitken was very poor in defence in 2016 and the little time he played in 2017. He also is not so good at setting up his winger - seems to die with ball a lot. When a high ball comes his way, he allows it to bounce and then more often than not does not gather the ball or stop the opposition from gaining more ground. Aitken has been given more latitude than others - a favourite of Mary's but still seems to make the same mistakes and have the same skill shortages. In my opinion he should never have been extended last year.
Who knows why Millward extended Aitken rather than buying Gagai.
The problem is he doesn't seem to be improving.Frank Facer said; "Mann had 3 years to show what he had got. I would rather give Mann and Lomax 40 minutes each..."
I don't disagree with this comment and understand comments about his defence, but I just wouldn't write Aitken off. For one he's still only very young (22) Was playing when we led the comp last year, and is IMO a very powerful runner. He has upsides. My preference is for Mann in round 1 but feel Aitken should also get a shot in the trials as Im not fussed who wins or by what margin I just want the best combinations for round 1. not against rotating the 4 options and as I disagree with some who've stated that we have good quality depth in the centres. I've yet to see enough consistency for 26 or 25 rounds from any of them to convince me we have an abundance of NRL quality centres, hopefully this is sorted this year
100%This thread is exactly why I stick mainly to JA. Some Mensa candidates in here.
Speaking of footy IQ, good to have you on the forum MaryI'm not arguing the numbers.
I'm arguing the footy IQ of those who voted. Hence not taking any notice of the poll.
I know a lot about the game from an inner sanctum point of view. How coaches coach, how players play, how KPIs work etc. Hint: It's a lot different from the tripe you see on here and other overhyped stats based things (supercoach etc.).
The average fan doesn't know what makes a good footballer.
It's sad, but a product of tv dumbing the game down to attract a wider range of fans.
There's a lot more to Rugby League. I'm wasting my time explaining it here though.
Carry on the gibberish.