sup42
Juniors
- Messages
- 2,401
Agreed.Sounds like Mogg was already working with us anyway. Now it's just more full time hands on than before.
Smart move, less disruption.
In some ways it's a no brainer, they have a working relationship, McFadden has insured himself with assistants who in the Short term aren't hunting his Job ( Unlike Tony Iro ) to be fair they should have aspirations in the longer term.
Mogs has been the video analysis man....and that performance last night reflected it ( he's in charge of the attack now) , there were lots of tactically smart uses of Tomkins and Johnson....attempts to link Matulino and Townsend....with partial success.
I've read comparisons to the Brisbane trial and that's fair enough too, key difference for me is the plays were run with a bit more pressure from Canberra than that trial game.....and even though they were poor.....the offensive defending Ricky Henry is achieving sets those two games apart.
McFadden has done well to knock off a lot of the Warriors inconsistencies.
Four games in a row under McFadden.....four eighty minute efforts.
Putting pressure on players through the KPI thing is separating the Chaff from the wheat.....Hurrells bounced back.....Danes dropping off ( Injured though this week ) the introduction of young talent is being well supported too.
I thought is was a mature decision to pick Locke to rest Havili. Lockes role was to make few errors and limit miss tackles....he was never going to be a revolutionary Hooking discovery......he could have tried to be......which would have been selfish and probably would have seen Locke exposed.
Last edited: