What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Meet the Skanks

adamkungl

Immortal
Messages
42,971
do you seriously not get it? why don't you use a word that doesn't imply that when women have sex it's a bad and whorey and shameful thing.

call her anything - deceitful, hateful, a bitch, an opportunist, a mercenary, a f**kwit, a vulture, a whatever you like.

do you want me to send you a dictionary?

Quite simply because its not quite as insulting. You're reading too far into the meaning of it. Insults rarely have an actual basis in truth.
 

Mad Dogg

Juniors
Messages
2,359
so just cause you don't find it offensive means it isn't?

I agree that someone's sex life has nothing to do with anything, and it pisses me off that that's the word used. the same way it pisses me off when a guy who's been turned down calls a girl a stupid s**t or a skank. it's laaaame.
Of course it's offensive. It's supposed to be offensive.

If it were a guy we'd be calling him a dickhead or a c*$&. Since it's a woman we're calling her a skank or a bitch. And considering what they did was purely for money, I'd say skank is a good term for them.
 

sass

Juniors
Messages
1,073
I'm saying as a woman who has nothing to do with this and would never do anything like this - I find it offensive.

if you care about anyone else maybe you wanna have a bit of class and use a different word.

you know, a word that has ANYTHING to do with what you're talking about and not to do with how much a woman f**ks.

in the same way there are a whole lot of insults you couls use but wouldn't cause they're racist and offend a whole bunch of people who have nothing to do with what you're talking about.

jesus.
 

adamkungl

Immortal
Messages
42,971
I'm saying as a woman who has nothing to do with this and would never do anything like this - I find it offensive.

if you care about anyone else maybe you wanna have a bit of class and use a different word.

you know, a word that has ANYTHING to do with what you're talking about and not to do with how much a woman f**ks.

in the same way there are a whole lot of insults you couls use but wouldn't cause they're racist and offend a whole bunch of people who have nothing to do with what you're talking about.

jesus.

Guess we disagree on principle then. I have no issues with women, nor any issues with anyone, man or woman, rooting as often as they like with whoever they like. Their business, not mine. But I'm of the belief that if you're going to not use certain words to insult people because you're worried about offending, then you shouldn't bother wasting your time insulting them. Apologies for any offense to you personally
 

Kiki

First Grade
Messages
6,349
god you lot are battlers. honestly.

can't you understand we don't care if you want to insult her for what she's done, but we do care that you are insinuating she's s**tty when that has NOTHING to do with the situation??

i hate when people insult women they so often call them a name which implies promiscuity. this doesn't happen with men. and THAT my friends, is sexism.

definition -

Skank - One who is disgustingly foul or filthy and often considered sexually promiscuous. Used especially of a woman or girl.

why cant you just say she's greedy or something??
 

adamkungl

Immortal
Messages
42,971
then lets go get the dictionary definitions of bitch, dickhead, motherf**ker, deadsh*t....etc

note to LU - no insults from now on unless they are actually true.

Kiki, I understand why you're offended, I just disagree.
 

Mad Dogg

Juniors
Messages
2,359
Does calling a guy a wanker mean we think he masturbates multiple times a day?

Does calling a guy a bastard indicate we think he is an illegitimate child?

Does calling a woman a skank mean we think she prostitutes herself?

What is the difference? They are offensive words that are gender specific, but generally aren't meant in the way they technically mean.
 
Messages
17,545
christ none of you get it. trying to explain it is pointless. forget it.

I think the guys are making valid arguments, but those arguments don't realte to what you and Sass are saying.

Guy's the girls are saying that it OFFENDS THEM as women.

Maybe understand that part and whilst trying to offend those women who are gold digging bitches, spare a thought for others feelings.
 
Messages
49
http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/sport/nrl/story/0,26746,25217169-5003409,00.html

Meet the girl who sold out Brett Seymour for $3000

EXCLUSIVE by Josh Massoud | March 20, 2009 11:00pm


0,,6541387,00.jpg
Behind the lens ... Rachael Muldoon as a Hooters girl. / The Daily Telegraph


THIS is the former Hooters waitress behind the camera phone that busted drunken Sharks half Brett Seymour and sealed his two-match suspension. The Daily Telegraph can reveal Sutherland Shire model Rachael Muldoon captured the damning footage of Seymour stumbling up Cronulla mall half-naked and sold the vision to Channel Nine for $3000.
Cronulla officials were about to clear Seymour to play this weekend until the footage was made public on Thursday. They had no choice but to axe the No. 7 when pictures of him shirtless, inebriated and falling over a blonde woman - who happens to be Muldoon's friend Liz - emerged.
Muldoon said Nine's $3000 cheque was split three ways between her, Liz and another woman who witnessed the Cronulla mall debacle about 1am Monday morning.
See the video of an out-of-it Brett Seymour
Was Rachael Muldoon right to sell the video? Tell us below
Seymour was ejected from popular nightspot 2230 Bar & Restaurant just minutes earlier. The mall's CCTV footage shows Muldoon at the front door as he came out.
Venue manager Michael Major said Ms Muldoon had earlier been denied entry because she was barred from the club, but she claimed last night this was untrue and that she merely "has a problem with one of the bouncers".
Mr Major said: "She was waiting out the front when Brett was escorted from the premises and tried to approach him. The footage shows Brett brushing her away and continuing up the mall."
The three women followed Seymour, who tripped over and was helped to his feet by Liz. It was at this point that Ms Muldoon took out a camera phone and began filming the pair as they fell on top of each other.
She continued to record Seymour after he regained his balance and removed his shirt.
When contacted by The Daily Telegraph yesterday, Muldoon denied she had filmed Seymour's drunkenness with the intention of making money from the footage.
"It was just a bit of a joke at the time," she said.
"But when we heard that he'd been suspended by Cronulla we thought it wouldn't do any further harm to him to sell it."
Seymour, however, had only been temporarily stood down when Muldoon approached Channel Nine.
Cronulla CEO Tony Zappia said the club's investigation had revealed no serious wrongdoing, and said there was every chance Seymour would have been reinstated for Monday night's clash against Newcastle. He has now been stood down until round four and fined $20,000.
"Prior to looking at what was on the phone there was nothing in our investigation that confirmed any allegation against Brett," Zappia said.
"But the camera phone followed him everywhere, showed everything. I felt sickened."
Muldoon said she had never met Seymour before last weekend, but said she had been introduced to other Sharks players at last year's Hooters Girls pageant.
Prop Ben Ross, winger Misi Taulapapa and back-rower Reece Williams were all guest judges at the bikini-clad event, in which Muldoon finished a finalist.
She continued to work as a waitress at the Cronulla restaurant until its closure a fortnight ago.
Fearing a backlash, both Muldoon and Liz had gone to great lengths to conceal their identities. Muldoon claimed a Channel Nine employee had promised to "blur out" Liz in the parts of the footage from which her friend could be identified.
But Nine failed to adequately conceal Liz's identity during broadcast and Muldoon said the women were now "looking at our options".

For three thousand bucks? Bloody oath. Do unto others buddy. I'd take a video of him hooning around and sell it up for $10. At the end of the day, it's a tax free profit of a notorious drunken idiot whom has had these issues before in the past.

These players know that they have backing behind them and continue to go out there and get plastered and make absolute wankers of themselves.

As far as I am concerned, this young lass was smart for playing him, and then cashing in.

If this was indeed a bloke that was in this situation, would you call him a "skank" for doing it? Or just a tossa? Choose your words carefully champ, I don't see anything skanky here. I see it purely as an intelligent move.

If you're a professional rugby league player, you should expect this. Yet these idiots continue to slip up. Good on her, and enjoy the 20 grand less Seymour you belter.
 

adamkungl

Immortal
Messages
42,971
christ none of you get it. trying to explain it is pointless. forget it.

I'm fairly sure I get it. By using terms like skank and s**t to insult a woman we know nothing about, you get the impression we're casting negative implications on female sexuality.
 

bartman

Immortal
Messages
41,022
For three thousand bucks? Bloody oath. Do unto others buddy. I'd take a video of him hooning around and sell it up for $10. At the end of the day, it's a tax free profit of a notorious drunken idiot whom has had these issues before in the past.

These players know that they have backing behind them and continue to go out there and get plastered and make absolute wankers of themselves.

As far as I am concerned, this young lass was smart for playing him, and then cashing in.

If this was indeed a bloke that was in this situation, would you call him a "skank" for doing it? Or just a tossa? Choose your words carefully champ, I don't see anything skanky here. I see it purely as an intelligent move.

If you're a professional rugby league player, you should expect this. Yet these idiots continue to slip up. Good on her, and enjoy the 20 grand less Seymour you belter.
Well said. Finally someone who would admit that taking an opportunity has nothing to do with gender.

I love how dimwits in here get all moral about "skanks" taking/selling some mobile phone footage of the public antics of a pissed guy who should know better, but leap to the defence of players charged with violent acts toward women. Oh hang on, I see the common thread... players can do no wrong :roll:.
 

Mad Dogg

Juniors
Messages
2,359
I think the guys are making valid arguments, but those arguments don't realte to what you and Sass are saying.

Guy's the girls are saying that it OFFENDS THEM as women.

Maybe understand that part and whilst trying to offend those women who are gold digging bitches, spare a thought for others feelings.
I just see this as overly-PC to women though. Guys don't get worked up when other guys are called numerous gender-specific titles. I honestly don't see the difference, and think anyone who does has crossed from gender equality to gender bias.
 

adamkungl

Immortal
Messages
42,971
Well said. Finally someone who would admit that taking an opportunity has nothing to do with gender.

I love how dimwits in here get all moral about "skanks" taking/selling some mobile phone footage of the public antics of a pissed guy who should know better, but leap to the defence of players charged with violent acts toward women. Oh hang on, I see the common thread... players can do no wrong :roll:.

Who's defending violent acts towards women?
 

maxpower3000

Juniors
Messages
183
The way you butcher the english language is actually more insulting then your bitchy rant.
Now go fill your bath tub with water and see how long you can hold your breath

Sorry I upset you Pusssy, you didn't get any again this weekend, the picture of the boxer must mean you like to take it in the ring
 
Messages
49
Well said. Finally someone who would admit that taking an opportunity has nothing to do with gender.

I love how dimwits in here get all moral about "skanks" taking/selling some mobile phone footage of the public antics of a pissed guy who should know better, but leap to the defence of players charged with violent acts toward women. Oh hang on, I see the common thread... players can do no wrong :roll:.

I'm still trying to work out what she actually did that one could call her a "skank" for?

Did she sleep with him prior to take the video? If so, then you could look at that as a sign of being a skank, sure.

However, from what we (the public) have heard, all we know is that both him and her (as well as a few others) were out drinking, she took a video of him falling over intoxicated and acting like a knobhead, and then cashed it in.

How does that make her a skank? :lol:

Do we know if she had any relations with him? No, did the video show her making out with him? not that I saw. How is she a skank? lol
 

Latest posts

Top