Mergers and Premiership Tallies

[Baron Vo Mandor]

baron, a more suitable definition of morally reprehensible is your post a few pages back advocating violence against children.

That was tongue in cheek, another example though not quite as severe as ur premiership claims is some of Ulyssus's fine work.

Or Dragons fans avoidance of my request to prove that St George Dragons competed in the 2010 NRL comp let alone won it.

 

[muzby]

That was tongue in cheek, another example though not quite as severe as ur premiership claims is some of Ulyssus's fine work.

bullsh*t baron.. and even if it was, there are certain topics that should never be used, even as a joke..

anything that involves beating up kids is one of them..

 

[Baron Vo Mandor]

But its alright to have Ullysus talk about dismembering and burning us anti 16 premiership people with acid?

Mate u blokes lost the right to the moral high ground a long time ago.

 

[muzby]

But its alright to have Ullysus talk about dismembering and burning us anti 16 premiership people with acid?

Mate u blokes lost the right to the moral high ground a long time ago.

firstly, the probability of that happening is extremely low, even someone of your ilk should know that.. and if you felt truly threatened by that talk, then there are avenues for you to take..

secondly, you would be able to defend yourself.. so it's not really the same thing at all..

thirdly, the only person here trying to claim a moral "high ground" is you, and as pointed out, chosing between 16 premierships and beating up a child as being the textbook definition of morally reprehensible, i'd know which one i'd be chosing.

 

[Baron Vo Mandor]

I'd never hit a child muzby and I am sorry if you are dumb enough to think that I would..... Now may we jump back on topic if its pleasing?

 

[muzby]

I'd never hit a child muzby and I am sorry if you are dumb enough to think that I would..... Now may we jump back on topic if its pleasing?

don't start insulting me sunshine.. it's not a case of anyone being "dumb enough" to think what you wrote is true.. (does this mean everything else you have written is not true as well btw?)

all it takes is one person on this public forum to read what you wrote and decide to follow those instructions and the damage is done...

you may not hit a child yourself, but you are helping to portray the image that it is okay for someone else to do it..

think before you post and don't try to make humour out of inappropriate topics.

 

[Baron Vo Mandor]

don't start insulting me sunshine.. it's not a case of anyone being "dumb enough" to think what you wrote is true.. (does this mean everything else you have written is not true as well btw?)

all it takes is one person on this public forum to read what you wrote and decide to follow those instructions and the damage is done...

you may not hit a child yourself, but you are helping to portray the image that it is okay for someone else to do it..

think before you post and don't try to make humour out of inappropriate topics.

SERIOUSLY!

 

[muzby]

why? isn't it "the right and honourable thing to do"?

 

[Baron Vo Mandor]

Poor widdle muzby's sensabilities are offended, do I need to burb you bubby boy?

 

[Tigger Madness]

I dont remember a 125 page thread when the Tigers won the comp in 2005. Everybody just accepted it as a maiden premiership and moved on.

1.

 

[muzby]

Poor widdle muzby's sensabilities are offended, do I need to burb you bubby boy?

what, only burp now? shouldn't you be giving me a belting?

it's not just my sensibilities you are rilling baron... i'm assuming that you have never had to deal with family violence or know someone affected by it..

maybe you can mix things up a bit and pick on cancer victims now?

 

[Firey_Dragon]

I dont remember a 125 page thread when the Tigers won the comp in 2005. Everybody just accepted it as a maiden premiership and moved on.

1.

Most dragons fans couldn't care less how it's recorded, or what other fans think about it.

There wasn't a 125 page thread back then because the Tigers winning a premiership doesn't hurt as much as a Dragons premiership. People like Baron have nothing now, and they know it, no longer can they use the choke tag so they resort to saying it was a premiership where we weren't the best side (storm gone) or that it's our 1st premiership.

It's given me a good laugh that it's managed to go on for nearly 3 months now with no sign of slowing down.

 

[Willow]

That was tongue in cheek

Violence against children is funny?

You must be a real hit around the weekend bbq.

Careful baroness, there's someone who is PMing me. He/she is getting upset about the direction this thread is heading in. And they're serious. The complainant has a list of words and comments that should be forbidden in these forums - although they are being somewhat selective as to who should be subject to the censorship.

Strangely, misrepresenting players' statements and belting children seemed to slip under its radar.

 

[Hutty1986]

Most dragons fans couldn't care less how it's recorded, or what other fans think about it.

There wasn't a 125 page thread back then because the Tigers winning a premiership doesn't hurt as much as a Dragons premiership. People like Baron have nothing now, and they know it, no longer can they use the choke tag so they resort to saying it was a premiership where we weren't the best side (storm gone) or that it's our 1st premiership.

It's given me a good laugh that it's managed to go on for nearly 3 months now with no sign of slowing down.

The backlash from the same little sad group of bitter nuff-nuffs is hilarious :lol:

 

[SoftSydney]

Not sure if this has been posted anywhere a good random read and laugh

If you haven't seen them, then you should check out...

Fox Sports Awards: the real winners of the 2010 NRL premiership season

http://www.foxsports.com.au/league/n...-1225934211889

 

[SoftSydney]

Violence against children is funny?

You must be a real hit around the weekend bbq.

Careful baroness, there's someone who is PMing me. He/she is getting upset about the direction this thread is heading in. And they're serious. The complainant has a list of words and comments that should be forbidden in these forums - although they are being somewhat selective as to who should be subject to the censorship.

Strangely, misrepresenting players' statements and belting children seemed to slip under its radar.

Sounds very serious LOLOLOL your a champ Willow

 

[InThatNumber]

Not sure if this has been posted anywhere a good random read and laugh

If you haven't seen them, then you should check out...

Fox Sports Awards: the real winners of the 2010 NRL premiership season

http://www.foxsports.com.au/league/n...-1225934211889

Too bad it's a cricket scoreboard... 1st innings 2nd innings.. wickets...

here is a better one....

http://www.foxsports.com.au/league/...emiership-season/story-fn2mcuj6-1225934211889

Best quote of the page...

THE IN-YOUR-FACE AWARD
(Having the Last Laugh)
Winner: St George Illawarra - They were labelled too boring, took the penalty goal too often, had no punch, but then they knocked out the Roosters. Credit where credit's due; the Dragons are deserved 2010 premiers.

 

[Y2Eel]

LOL. Would you like to rephrase that?

No cos there is no way i am Smarter so that phrase stays like that!

 

[Y2Eel]

firstly, the probability of that happening is extremely low, even someone of your ilk should know that.. and if you felt truly threatened by that talk, then there are avenues for you to take..

secondly, you would be able to defend yourself.. so it's not really the same thing at all..

thirdly, the only person here trying to claim a moral "high ground" is you, and as pointed out, chosing between 16 premierships and beating up a child as being the textbook definition of morally reprehensible, i'd know which one i'd be chosing.

and the probability of Baroness attacking small children is probably 0....

Secondly a child would have no problem defending themselves against baroness so there goes that point...

Glad this thread keeps the Less fortunate busy..

 

[CMUX]

Thats another debate for those who are arguing , what is the difference why arent people questioning should canterbury be awarded the premiership count.


Stgeorge and illawarra are entitled to be awarded premierships .


if teams like the sydney bulldogs and roosters are merging with canterbury and eastern suburbs premierships when in fact they arent representing the same areas.


Dragons are representing the same area

No they are not. St George Illawarra Dragons (totally separate entity to the other 2) are the only ones who get awarded a 2010 premiership. As for the bulldogs/roosters argument it is not about what area they are representing or what marketing name they use, it is about the club that is registered with the NRL.

STGI could rename themselves the Australia Dragons next year if they wanted to and as long as they were still registered with the NRL under their current name then all achievements from next year onwards would be added to the ones since 1999.