HevyDevy
Coach
- Messages
- 17,146
Didn't we actually win a few games after Eric got dropped?
We also won a few before he was dropped
Didn't we actually win a few games after Eric got dropped?
1. Defence - goal line, ruck and fringes. The whole defensive line is ordinary. Attack - 21 points per game. Defence - 22 points per game. Changing the fullback may malke a difference however Haynes ability under the highball is not that much better than Burts.
2. Lack of ball movement through the forwards. One out off the dummy half every hit up is only going to see players get dominated. We lack ball runners in the team outside of Mateo. .
I agree, but defending our goal line, its not the high ball thats our problem. We are pretty solid there, its attackers strolling through arm grabs that is our biggest problem.
I think we all know we've played our best football this year when we've been throwing the ball around. We look so unthreatening just taking the hit ups.
And changing the fullback doesn't change that at all, those areas that need to be addressed - Finch, Reddy, Inu, Tautai, Williams - are all still in the lineup as well.
It has always been our best form of football since 2000. But like Smith before him, Hagan seems to not like mistakes - gievn that he coached a side like Newcastle who were very much from the pass and hope mould its a real shift in mentality.
They are too easily dominated.
I think we all know we've played our best football this year when we've been throwing the ball around. We look so unthreatening just taking the hit ups.
I agree there was never any evidence Hayne demanded to play FB in the article.
I hope the whole thing is overstated and the divisions between younger blokes and the older are nota s bad as made out.
My concern would be some of Hindmarsh's reported comments critical of Hayne, Tautai and Inu, and occasions where Riddell and Finch have blown up at younger blokes.
I hope the general theme of the article is not true because ican't see any hope of the drastic improvment we all want if the squad is in disharmony.
I also hope the senior players aren't blaming the younger blokes without addressing their own form, whcih is a far bigger concern IMO.
He put himself there to be honest, with his comments in the media about "not wanting to play wing", having already failed in the centres (compare dto Reddy and Inu, also could be said learning and playing out-of-position). As Hagan says, here's the guy's chance, will his actions be bigger than his words?Hayne, this weeks scapegoat in waiting.
He put himself there to be honest, with his comments in the media about "not wanting to play wing", having already failed in the centres (compare dto Reddy and Inu, also could be said learning and playing out-of-position). As Hagan says, here's the guy's chance, will his actions be bigger than his words?
When ego runs higher than team spirit, then you know there's no chance of cohesiveness. In retrospect, looks like this has been a problem since the off-season, and certain prolonged haggling over contract re-signings...
i have been concerned for some time now at the messages coming out of the club by way of player statements and interviews....because i am fearful theer are two divisions amongst the playing ranks.
it seems that there is a cadre of young islanders who are completely at odds in terms of playing style, approach and attitude with the older "whiter" division led by the likes of Hindmarsh.
Both sides have the good and bad....but im concerned at the possible two divisions.
I think much of the division comes back to the contract negotiations and the money being tossed about. For a long time Hindmarsh has been the highest or one of the highest paid players in the club and he has earnt that through what he puts in on the park. No one would begrudge what the bloke earns - he may not be at the peak of his playing powers however he is as good as most of the top paid backrowers in the game at the moment.
Along come Hayne and to a lesser extent Mateo and Inu and they are being lauded in the media, given big money contracts and all three are only in the infancy of their careers. In terms of earning the big money they have done it on potential moreso then what they have done on the field.
It is the nature of rugby league at the moment and there could be a good deal of resentment in regards to the younger players not putting in the hard yards to earn the contracts they are getting.
Especially seeing we are losing the likes of Riddell, Robinson and some older players in recent seasons due to salary cap restraints.
i thought he said that he didn't want to play wing because he wasn't getting involved enough, would talk to hagan about playing fullback but would do whatever the coach thought was best for the team.He put himself there to be honest, with his comments in the media about "not wanting to play wing", having already failed in the centres (compare dto Reddy and Inu, also could be said learning and playing out-of-position). As Hagan says, here's the guy's chance, will his actions be bigger than his words?
When ego runs higher than team spirit, then you know there's no chance of cohesiveness. In retrospect, looks like this has been a problem since the off-season, and certain prolonged haggling over contract re-signings...