Minichiello vs Hodgson

[daslacker]

Schifcofske was being considered to play for Australia.

:lol: By raiders fans.

He is a great club player though.

 

[Anonymous]

1. Hodgson
2. Slater
3. Mini
4. Hornby
5. Bowen
6. Hunt
7. Schifoski (sp)
8. Wesser
9. Mckinnon
10. Stewart
11. Webb

Hodgson has had a good season and to me is the only reason why the Tigers had any chance of winning. Mini has been a bit meh.

 

[Steven Gerrard]

Oh well, you still know nothing about football, as your list pointed out.

I think you hold that title, when you created this topic. ;-)

 

[hybrid_tiger]

Oh well, you still know nothing about football, as your list pointed out.

I think you hold that title, when you created this topic. ;-)

33 people disagree with you and another 30 obviously saw it fit to compare the two. ;-)

 

[Steven Gerrard]

Yeah like 33 Tigers fans. :lol:

Look, everyone has got differing opinions, and me and you are not going to agree on this, and this will just keep on going and going. So theres no point arguing, i wrote who i thought was better, you can agree or not. But I don't care. It's my opinion, you don't have to like it. So lets just stop before this becomes 12 pages or bickering.

 

[swing_low]

Webb ahead of anyone?

 

[hybrid_tiger]

Yeah like 33 Tigers fans. :lol:

Look, everyone has got differing opinions, and me and you are not going to agree on this, and this will just keep on going and going. So theres no point arguing, i wrote who i thought was better, you can agree or not. But I don't care. It's my opinion, you don't have to like it. So lets just stop before this becomes 12 pages or bickering.

I see, so you start it and you want someone else to finish it? :lol:

Pathetic. You and your mate greeneyed are exactly the same.

And I doubt there would even be 33 Tigers fans on this board, and if you read some of the posts in this thread, alot of non-Tigers supporters voted for Hodgson. So your theory is almost as good as your argumentive ability.

I also find it funny that only a Raiders fan would dispute this thread. ;-)

 

[Steven Gerrard]

:roll: Moron....You got nothing other than making it personal... #-o

 

[hybrid_tiger]

:roll: Moron....You got nothing other than making it personal... #-o

No. You start a stupid argument and try to finish it when you know you're wrong and then try to act like the nice guy. :roll:

You're pathetic and your list proves it. As I said before go and watch some games and get back to me.

And yet again you didnt respond to my statement, that alot of non-Tigers supporters voted for Hodgson. But keep ignoring the truth. It just makes you look stupid, which you are quite skilled at.

 

[Raider Azz]

#-o Not another Raiders vs. Tigers thread...

 

[Y2Eel]

2001 hodgson alot better then 2004
also...

2000 Schifcofske alot better then 2004 :mrgreen:

 

[Steven Gerrard]

No. You start a stupid argument and try to finish it when you know you're wrong and then try to act like the nice guy.

Stupid Argument?? :lol: :lol: OK HERE I GO.

SCHIFCOFSKE VS HODGCRAP


SCHIF:

TACKLES: 94
OFFLOADS: 64
KICKS: 26
TRY ASSISTS: 1
LINE BREAKS: 8
HIT UPS: 343
METRES GAINED: 3026
DUMMY HALF RUNS: 78
ERRORS: 16
MISTACKLES: 35

7/10


HODGCRAP:

TACKLES: 76
OFFLOADS: 20
KICKS: 25
TRY ASSISTS: 6
LINE BREAKS: 20
HIT UPS: 306
METRES GAINED: 2873
DUMMY HALF RUNS: 37
ERRORS: 33 BUTTERFINGERS??? :lol:
MISTACKLES: 35

2/10

HMMMM GEEZ I WONDER.....


Source: NRL Stats

 

[Eddie.]

Tries is not a stat now????

11-5

Hodgcrap ( very funny isint it)

 

[Steven Gerrard]

To add to that, this isn't Schif's greatest season, yet he still craps all over Hodgcrap. 8) I would have loved to see 2003 Stats for Schif vs Hodgcrap.

 

[Eddie.]

To add to that, this isn't Schif's greatest season, yet he still craps all over Hodgcrap. 8) I would have loved to see 2003 Stats for Schif vs Hodgcrap.

Mistackles per game - hodgo 1.8, drug taker 1.9

So please award that to Hodgson

 

[xwizit]

To add to that, this isn't Schif's greatest season, yet he still craps all over Hodgcrap. 8) I would have loved to see 2003 Stats for Schif vs Hodgcrap.

Mistackles per game - hodgo 1.8, drug taker 1.9

So please award that to Hodgson

OMG 0.1 :shock: :lol:

 

[Eddie.]

20 line breaks to 8, 11 tries to 5, 6 try assists to one

Hodgo shits all over the drug taker in the main stats

 

[Eddie.]

To add to that, this isn't Schif's greatest season, yet he still craps all over Hodgcrap. 8) I would have loved to see 2003 Stats for Schif vs Hodgcrap.

Mistackles per game - hodgo 1.8, drug taker 1.9

So please award that to Hodgson

OMG 0.1 :shock: :lol:

yep 8)

 

[hybrid_tiger]

Tackles - Doesnt prove anything. Mistackles proves something and they are both equal.
Offloads - He doesnt need to offload, because he has more line-breaks, which result in clean passes, not offloads. He offloaded more than once last night, if you watch the game.
Kicks - Prince does all our kicking.
Try Assists - one of the most important stats, and Hodgson a clear winner.
Line breaks - yet again a very important stat and Hodgson a clear winner once again.
Hit ups - Doesnt prove much, but Hodgson takes enough hit-ups as he needs to, especially considering his size.
Metres gained - Hodgson has gained enough metres to score 11 tries. How many tries has Schif scored? :lol:
Dummy half runs: Hodgson sh1ts all over him yet again.
Errors - Very surprised at that stat. He has been as safe as a house at the back.
Mistackles - Hodgson is the size of a peanut, yet still has the same amount of mistackles as Schif. :lol: He is also targeted alot in defence.

Interesting how you left our tries scored and goals. Don't want to show the real truth now do we? :lol:

Nice effort though, but try harder next time.

 

[Eddie.]

Hybrid dont bother, this is a guy who said Wesser was better then Hodgson in 2004

He clearly doesnt watch football, if by some off chance he does, its very worrying.