strider said:
well rubin wiki got sweet f**k all for a knee which actually hurt someone - so why should morley get more? - and don't give me any crap about accidental
greg bird did a premeditated knee in the f**king head - of course he deserved more
i respect morely - he plays hard and maybe oversteps the line at times but he takes plenty back himself .... reminds me alot of mark geyer who i also enjoyed watching play .... and no i am most certainly not a roosters supporter
lol there's no comparison whatsoever to Ruben Wiki's actions. If Ruben was charged correctly, he would have ended up with six weeks... SIX weeks, in comparison to that? And yes, I am a Warriors fan, and yes, Ruben Wiki was incredibly lucky, and yes, it was wrong he was found not guilty on a technicality. It was quite obvious there was an offence in his action.
However, comparing someone running into the play of the ball, and high kneeing someone? Give yourself a triple. Deadset. One was blatantly deliberate, one was arguable but still extremely dangerous. One was while the guy was fully on his feet knowing exactly what he was doing, the other was falling to the ground.
That's a 10 weeker, no brainer, and more given his disgraceful judiciary record. Adrian Morley and his "Friends" have often said Adrian is targetted, over the past few years Adrian has got off very lightly on a number of very serious issues. If this was a guy like John Hopoate or a Craig Smith or any other NRL scapegoat it'd have been 10-18, anywhere in between.
Soft. Very soft. The NRL really have set many bad precedents this year in their very aimless and soft charging. It's a complete reversal of years gone by. So far this year the Warriors have had one player suspended, if this was season 2003-2004 going by judicial standards of those years we'd have had 5-6 suspensions. Why the ridiculous inconsistencies?