Ron's_Mate
Bench
- Messages
- 4,131
Sack Henry because it's cheaper than sacking Hayne, then you are stuck with Hayne still stinking up the team because it would cost too much to sack him. Titans would be writing off 2018 in advance.
Article was written by Phil Rothfield.
So the NRL pretty much owns the joint, who do you think they want to get rid of? It aint rocket science. The Coach is goooone. Its cheaper for them. Hayne is an NRL pin up boy.
How did things turn out when the Tigers got rid of Potter for Farah? Someone remind me.
Heard that about multiple tiger players too. The next big things that the club was going to be built around.Not sure which part of multiple players have an issue with Henry, people are not understanding?
Heard that about multiple tiger players too. The next big things that the club was going to be built around.
An article slagging an NRL owned team in the same week he publishes one praising an ex News Corp owned team. That's Slothfield's idea of balance.A man of high integrity who dots the i's and crosses the t's.
A lot of the posts are overlooking that Ash Taylor is having differences with Neil Henry as well. You really think its in the Titans best interests to lose their best star for the sake of holding on to Henry? I agree that players shouldn't call the shots, but the team has been scored against them over 40 points in the last two games. The best call would be to pull the plug, and let Henry go.
You don't want a bloke at your club who has massive potential that he never quite fulfilled? A guy who has played fullback and centre for nsw and centre for Australia? A guy who has had a massive falling out with his club? A guy who has overvalued himself in contract negotiations? A guy who has been a marquee player in teams that have consistently underperformed? A guy who has a dream of playing in the NFL and in rugby?Some are blaming Hayne & some are blaming Henry.
Those blaming the coach, ask yourself, would you have Hayne at your club?
If the answer is no, you may wish to change your opinion.
I sure as hell don't want him at mine.
You dont let players choose the coach. Especially ones that are either underperforming, overrated or havnt really done anything in first grade yet.So which is it?
You have a problem when its Hayne, or a lot of players?
You think a coach should be kept when they lose the dressing room?
what quality coaches are on the open market? Can't think of many..
You don't want a bloke at your club who has massive potential that he never quite fulfilled? A guy who has played fullback and centre for nsw and centre for Australia? A guy who has had a massive falling out with his club? A guy who has overvalued himself in contract negotiations? A guy who has been a marquee player in teams that have consistently underperformed? A guy who has a dream of playing in the NFL and in rugby?
I've got some very bad news for you mate.