What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

New ARLC CEO Discussion

Who is your preferred NRL CEO?


  • Total voters
    156

flippikat

First Grade
Messages
5,136
Oh God please not Ian Robson - he was hopeless as the first CEO at the Warriors.

For all I care, he can stay in AFL.
 

El Diablo

Post Whore
Messages
94,107
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/spo...446270625?sv=daadd87e8c0e0e24257b58e7465296ed

John Grant defends go-slow in search for new leader

by: Brent Read
From: The Australian
August 09, 2012 12:00AM

ARL Commission chairman John Grant yesterday dismissed suggestions the game was suffering from a leadership vacuum and insisted there was no need to rush the appointment of a new chief executive because the current administration was doing an outstanding job.

He also said that talks over the next broadcasting deal had been slowed by the Olympics but were beginning to heat up again. The Australian understands the Seven and Ten networks have until later this month to make formal bids.

Grant, about to mark the six-month anniversary of the commission's formation, confirmed that interviews had begun with the short-listed candidates for the chief executive's position. However, he would give no firm date on when a permanent replacement for David Gallop would be made. Strategy and special projects director Shane Mattiske is filling the chief executive's role on an interim basis.

"This organisation is working really, really well," Grant said yesterday. "We feel under no pressure whatsoever to hurry the appointment of the chief executive officer because this organisation has lost its way. That is absolutely not the case.

"If you look at the way the business is operating, I think they are doing a fantastic job. They have all said they have a job to do and they're doing it really well.

"We're completely comfortable with the way the business is running so we have to get the right person. It will be the best candidate.

"You need to do what you need to do to get to know the person because it's a big deal. It's a big decision. This board, this commission, this business, is going to be successful or not by virtue of the chief executive we appoint."

While the broadcasting talks and search for a new chief executive have been at the forefront of the commission's thinking, significant issues involving the game's finance are looming large.

The Australian understands the game's 16 clubs will seek assurances over future funding -- including a renewed commitment to receive an additional $500,000 before November 1 -- when the nascent NRL Council holds a landmark meeting with the commission later this month.

Before then, the clubs themselves will meet next week to decide what issues they want to highlight to the commission. The biggest is expected to be future funding as the vast majority of clubs seek more financial muscle from the next broadcasting deal.

As part of the commission's formation, the clubs received a commitment late last year that they would receive an instant injection of $500,000 when the new broadcasting deal was finalised. The clubs want assurances of that pledge at their meeting with the commission.

Beyond that, the clubs are believed to want an assurance that funding from next season onward will exceed the salary cap. The council, to be made up of representatives from the 16 clubs, had sought regular meetings with the commission to press the clubs' concerns.

The Australian understands the commission has agreed to meet with the clubs on a quarterly basis. The inaugural meeting is scheduled for August 27, with each club providing one representative.

Before then, the clubs have been asked to attend a meeting on Tuesday at St George Leagues Club to outline what issues they want to put before the commission. The problem for both the club and the commission is that the issue of funding is set to be contingent on the broadcasting deal.

There are also several competing interests at play. While the clubs and the players through the Rugby League Players Association are pressing for their share of the game's riches, it is understood the commission is also intent on keeping money in reserve as part of a future fighting fund.
 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
69,258
Funny that Grant has given The Australian the interview and not Rothfield, lol at the gimp.

This is good to hear: it is understood the commission is also intent on keeping money in reserve as part of a future fighting fund.
 

Brutus

Referee
Messages
26,346
Hear that Slothfield???

Grant probably thinks your a lowlife scum and the fact he doesn't talk to you makes rugby league fans feel extremely happy.
 

Knownothing

Juniors
Messages
764
If things are so great, the organisation "has not lost its way", why did they sack Gallop again?



Have things turned right around in two months?
 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
69,258
Because that was the plan from inception, just gave News Ltd a bit of grace time. The writing was on the wall for Gallop from day one imo.
 

Quidgybo

Bench
Messages
3,054
If things are so great, the organisation "has not lost its way", why did they sack Gallop again?



Have things turned right around in two months?
Which is based on the false assumption that Gallop was pushed because the organisation was in a bad place. But you don't need there to be a problem to get rid of Gallop. You only need a view that he was not the right man to lead the new regime going forward. Same way the leader who wins the war is frequently not the right person to the lead the peace, and vice versa.

Leigh.
 

PaddyBoy

Juniors
Messages
939
Which is based on the false assumption that Gallop was pushed because the organisation was in a bad place. But you don't need there to be a problem to get rid of Gallop. You only need a view that he was not the right man to lead the new regime going forward. Same way the leader who wins the war is frequently not the right person to the lead the peace, and vice versa.

Leigh.

Like Winston "Let's leap straight into a war with the Soviets" Churchill.

:lol:
 

El Diablo

Post Whore
Messages
94,107
http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/...-to-the-front-for-top-job-20120812-242vt.html

Greenberg gallops to the front for top job

Date
August 13, 2012

Canterbury chief executive Todd Greenberg is strongly rumoured to be the next boss of the game. The Herald was told last week by a well connected source that Greenberg had advised the Bulldogs board that he had been offered the vacant ARL Commission chief executive job but Canterbury directors deny that happened. However, the speculation about Greenberg has continued to get louder and he is understood to have been interviewed for the job last week. It has also been rumoured that the commissioners, who will appoint the next chief executive following David Gallop's departure two months ago, would delay an announcement until they are sure they have got the right person but ARLC chairman John Grant said last week that the quality of the candidates was high.
 

Dogs Of War

Coach
Messages
12,721
Greenburg would be a might big loss to the Bulldogs, but if thats what it takes to make the whole game stronger I am all for it. Plus he does respond to supporters emails (well at least his PA does)
 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
69,258
ye gods can you imagine the favouritism whinging from other fans every time the Bulldogs have a decision go there way!
 

StMick

Bench
Messages
4,634
I don't know if anyone else saw the AFL footy show last night but a reporter on there said the NRL are trying to head hunt the AFL's number 2 man Gill McLachlan for the CEO's job.

Apparently the reporter's been told the NRL have told McLachlan the job's his if he wants it and with the AFL's CEO apparently ready to extend his contract by a couple of years McLachlan may be very interested.

Thoughts ??
progress.gif
 

Latest posts

Top