What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

New Zealand 2 will deal a massive blow to NZ rugby

Brian potter

First Grade
Messages
5,308
Literally anything but " Pasifika " ffs
Andrew John's supports it... just as a gauge of how dumb it is.
F@ck!!!!

if Andrew john’s supports it you know it’s bollocks.

incidentally wasn’t it Andrew johns who was calling for the warriors to be booted out of the NRL a few years ago?
 

flippikat

First Grade
Messages
5,272
That city has the beset chance of it working and it's still a bad idea. That is literally the Warriors fan base. Geez I hope the game is just paying lip service to the Government on this one and also using it as a bargaining chip against other potential bidders and we aren't actually considering it.
Precisely.

Rather than growing the overall supporter base for the NRL, a Pasifika team runs the risk of just tearing off a huge chunk of the Warriors fanbase - especially if the new club is based in Auckland.
 

Wb1234

Immortal
Messages
34,635
So you travelled from another country back home to use the internet?
You do realise that other countries have... the internet?
Probably lost his internet connection
With all this talk of club 18 there hasn’t been one expression of interest publicly from potential nz Bidders. that is somewhat surprising
if the warriors continue as they are I’ll be shocked if a genuine bid doesn’t emerge

indeed the arlc might force the issue themselves
 

docbrown

Coach
Messages
11,842
I thought he wanted 12. In any case asking a footballer about what is essentially a business decision is the definition of stupid
The idea being that fewer players = superior game quality = more interest. But only if you ignore the fact that killing off five clubs is the equivalent to killing off 30% of your current audience…
 

Colk

First Grade
Messages
6,750
The idea being that fewer players = superior game quality = more interest. But only if you ignore the fact that killing off five clubs is the equivalent to killing off 30% of your current audience…

That’s why he is an idiot. How much money would you lose by doing that from TV and sponsors etc?

Less money equals less investment to grassroots and less opportunities which in turn means that kids will find more opportunities in other sports.

Then in 20 years time some ignoramus like him will say that we don’t have enough quality for 12 teams or there isn’t enough interest in the game.
 

Latest posts

Top