Nah, you just don't understand a bunch of it because you're not equip for the discussion.
You don't truly understand the ideas we're discussing, or have any basis in the ideological traditions they sprout from, and are just parroting garbage you've heard from talking heads.
I never claimed that they were. In fact I went to great lengths to show that they weren't.
The analogy works fine, you're just attempting to avoid addressing the substance of the argument because your scripted dialogue has run out.
BTW, you clearly didn't look into Cynthia Ann Parker's story, let alone other relevant examples lol.
Another point, another dodge.
Either address the substance or maybe, by some miracle, you could reflect on the fact that you can't.
I never said that you were attempting to force people to adopt their ancestral culture, not directly anyway, but that's a different discussion. Either way it's totally irrelevant to the fact that your argument is race essentialist.
The fact that you are saying that ethnicity is inherited by birth at all makes your position race essentialist. Whether or not people choose to identify with that ethnic inheritance is totally irrelevant.
So yeah, that was a waste of time. It'd be nice if you'd take your cosmopolitan soft bigotry elsewhere from now on.
