The EELiminator
Coach
- Messages
- 12,209
nine's monopoly on the grand final has to end
if i want to watch it on kayo i should be able to
if i want to watch it on kayo i should be able to
NopeThe AFL ( DANZ) get around $340- to $360m pa with seven paying $180m SO for us coming from $250- to $260 from DANZ now, to go way past the AFL on $350m (mid point) to $450 is a stretch, in fact it wont happen- as business works when they paid overs for AFL MEANS just to match that would be great but as all business conditions tighten and so customers also , i anticipate same figure. look i don't want to talk about he AFL but their overs figure plays into what we will get, just business, so if we want more everything is up for grabs, i mean you sell the same product twice or even three times if possible.
I'm ready to jump shipIf Disney via ESPN can pick up NRL, or as much as I’d hate STAN to get it, it’d leave DAZN raising the price even more to cover AFL with NRL fans deserting Kayo
gee I
wonder why![]()
![]()
![]()
Even less data is known about the NRLs most recent deal.
Where you at on that
the NRL doesn't have any " pretend " contributions so nothing to hide
that's where I'm.. on that
Contra spending on marvel stadium has nothing to do with tv rights dealsThat the NRL has chosen not to sell its online rights is not on the AFL. Nor is it the AFLS fault that the NRL wrapped its Telstra contra deal in its naming rights instead of its media deal.
And Neither did the AFL include its radio rights in its broadcast deal, nor its print partnerships, as the NRL did with Nine media.
blah blah blahThat the NRL has chosen not to sell its online rights is not on the AFL. Nor is it the AFLS fault that the NRL wrapped its Telstra contra deal in its naming rights instead of its media deal.
And Neither did the AFL include its radio rights in its broadcast deal, nor its print partnerships, as the NRL did with Nine media.
Their previous ceo said afl was the number one state in qldblah blah blah
fumbleball is the one that includes in its media rights total value
undisclosed amounts from an organisation that isn't even a media provider , they're a telecommunications company
The NRL would never , put Telstras naming rights $ in its media rights deal , because
that would be dishonest & slimy
They can leave that sort of behaviour to the experts ... ALF
the list is longer then a 7 foot basket ballers right armTheir previous ceo said afl was the number one state in qld
They lied about the junior numbers in Balmain to kick soccer off birchgrove oval so they could play there
blah blah blah
fumbleball is the one that includes in its media rights total value
undisclosed amounts from an organisation that isn't even a media provider , they're a telecommunications company
The NRL would never , put Telstras naming rights $ in its media rights deal , because
that would be dishonest & slimy
They can leave that sort of behaviour to the experts ... ALF
better nothing then stinking liesThe NRL simply dont tell you anything. Im sure thats better.
better nothing then stinking lies
Afl came out at the time and said the deal was worth $4billion cash.Amount has been undisclosed. and every AFL cash figure on this or any other forum is guesswork.
Or that the nrl no longer actually reports separately on what it’s digital revenue is lolThat the NRL has chosen not to sell its online rights is not on the AFL. Nor is it the AFLS fault that the NRL wrapped its Telstra contra deal in its naming rights instead of its media deal.
And Neither did the AFL include its radio rights in its broadcast deal, nor its print partnerships, as the NRL did with Nine media.
