What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Next TV rights deal

Status
Not open for further replies.

El Diablo

Post Whore
Messages
94,107
http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/...of-monday-night-football-20150719-giflj4.html

Why Thursday night matches may spell the death of Monday Night Football

Date
July 19, 2015 - 8:54PM

Brad Walter
Sports Reporter

Anticipated blockbuster ratings for Thursday night matches at the end of the season are set to intensify Channel Nine's desire to make the concept a weekly event in the next television deal.

The NRL has scheduled matches on Thursday nights for the last four rounds of the premiership in a move that is expected to guarantee ratings success for Nine and may raise doubts about the long-term future of Monday Night Football.

Nine is keen on Thursday night matches as it ensures high ratings for The Footy Show, while Fox Sports will want Monday Night Football to continue for the same reason as it guarantees a strong lead in for Monday Night With Matty Johns.

However, most clubs are opposed to the NRL scheduling matches on both Monday and Thursday nights as it is harder to attract families when kids have to go to school the next day. There are also concerns about the turnaround time between matches and player welfare.

If Monday and Thursday night games feature in the draw for a full season, or most of the season, it is thought that the NRL would want to drop one of the two Friday night matches but Nine is understood to be keen to retain both.

It is believed that Nine would want to continue broadcasting one match live into Sydney and another into Brisbane on its main channel but viewers would be able to watch the alternative game live on a secondary channel, such as Gem.

Should that occur, Nine may have the rights to four matches per week - Thursday night, two games on Friday night and Sunday afternoon.

As a result, rival free-to-air networks Seven and Ten would be likely to miss out, although Fairfax Media reported on Sunday that Seven was interested in wresting a Saturday match from Fox Sports, as well as Thursday night games.

Fairfax Media also reported last week that one of the five matches per week Fox Sports currently broadcasts may pass to Ten, in which it now has a 15 per cent share, subject to ACCC approval. It was suggested that Ten may be interested in a Thursday night match, but would get the last pick of games for each round.

However, it is difficult to imagine Nine boss David Gyngell allowing that to happen given the ratings success of previous Thursday night matches, including the season opening Broncos-Rabbitohs clash which attracted a capital city audience of 729,000 and more than one million viewers nationally.

The NRL has scheduled a return to Thursday night matches in round 23, when North Queensland host Souths. St George Illawarra play Penrith the following Thursday night, with the Rabbitohs and Brisbane to meet again a week later and the Broncos taking on the Storm in round 26, also on Thursday night.

Nine is also reportedly keen to retain some input into scheduling after attracting just 403,000 capital city viewers for the recent Canberra-Newcastle Friday night match.

In comparison, last Friday night's Canterbury-Parramatta and Melbourne-Penrith matches were watched live by 531,000 viewers in Sydney (365,000), Brisbane (126,000), Melbourne (34,000) and Perth (6,000) and a further 299,000 on replay.

Given the drawing power of the Broncos, Nine will undoubtedly want to regularly feature them and teams such as Souths, the Dragons, Bulldogs and Eels on Friday nights but Gyngell is said to be at the same time sympathetic to clubs wanting to play more afternoon matches as he was a former Sydney Roosters director.

The push to have matches played over five days per week is supported by ratings figures, with previous rounds in which games have been played from Thursday to Monday averaging television audiences of 3.12 million compared to 2.587 million viewers for rounds featuring matches over four days, according to the Rugby League Ratings twitter account. But some clubs and media buyers have questioned whether interest would wane if matches were scheduled five days per week for the entire season.

"I'm a mad sports fan but would I want to watch the same sport five nights a week? Probably not," Chris Walton, managing director of Nunn Media told Mumbrella. "There is a risk of splintering the audience. Yes, if there was a game you wanted to watch, then yes it would invariably be on, but I worry this wouldn't work."

However, head of trading at Match Media Theo Zisoglou welcomed the idea.

"In the current TV landscape, the only content working for the free-to-air networks seems to be news, sport and Australian-made reality and drama," Zisoglou said. "So a shift to more live sport would definitely see a positive impact on TV viewing and open up more advertising opportunities."
 

nrlnrl

First Grade
Messages
6,888
The Fairfax articles are just based on possible outcomes bouncing back & forth like people posting threads & ideas on this forum. Seriously, it is a long way from being finished & the posting of 2 different articles within a week is just silly.
 

taipan

Referee
Messages
22,500
Refreshing to read Docbrown's considered views on the matter of TV deals/schedules.Last occasion closer to the mark on the outcome than many others.

By comparison we get PR's continuous negativity ,making assumptions(ignoring the extreme weather conditions) from afar.All on the back of not having currently a team in the NRL.
Just be patient FFS.
 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
69,866
well lets close down the discussion board and just have a news service then lol. People love to gossip, speculate and throw around ideas, it is the whole point of a message forum! We all know nothing has been decided and everything is on the table for review, might as well lock the thread until the outcome has been decided.
 

taipan

Referee
Messages
22,500
Correct me if I've got this wrong.Wasn't SOO series supposedly worth $100m pa to a Tv deal?
Is the $50m purported to be made by 7 ,a bit on the low side? Realise it is the starting bid.
 

insert.pause

First Grade
Messages
6,461
Correct me if I've got this wrong.Wasn't SOO series supposedly worth $100m pa to a Tv deal?
Is the $50m purported to be made by 7 ,a bit on the low side? Realise it is the starting bid.

Seven pay only $85m for all AFL content each year, no network will pay $100m annually for 3 origin games, it may win them 3 ratings weeks but they would struggle to get return paying anything close to that, and that includes intangible benefits like any halo effect.
 

Lockyer4President!

First Grade
Messages
7,975
Correct me if I've got this wrong.Wasn't SOO series supposedly worth $100m pa to a Tv deal?
Is the $50m purported to be made by 7 ,a bit on the low side? Realise it is the starting bid.

The $100M figure came about from a NewsLtd article estimating State of Origin's worth, not any concrete quote iirc.
 

Haffa

Guest
Messages
16,544
Didn't that figure also include tickets, sponsors and merch etc? I thought it was more a representation of it's value to the game and not specific to TV
 

taipan

Referee
Messages
22,500
I retraced my source .It came from the Financial Review 26th April 2015 by John Stensholt.Not any Telecrap hacks.
"
Nine's rivals are particularly interested in the three match State of Origin series,usually among the highest rating of any Tv show each year.NRL Chief Executive Dave Smith had indicated he wants the networks to bid for Origin as a separate asset,believing a move could unlock significant value for the sport and potentially valuing the series at between $50-$100million alone."

Yes I agree. it can be reasonably argued the figure includes sponsorship,merchandising ,ticketing and Govt funding(ALA Vic govt).

As 7 has bid $50m,that perhaps is the opening bid.

Whatever the reality,the code would be smiling at this early stage.
 

BuffaloRules

Coach
Messages
15,553
Channel 9 pay around $90m per year under the current deal for Origin and NRL games (Fri x 2 per week, Sun 1 per week.., 4-5 Thurday per year and Anzac Day)

Fox pay $100 mil per year for theirs.

Rest is Telstra and NZ...
 

whall15

Coach
Messages
15,871
I wonder if that's $50mil over five years or $50m/annum? I suspect the former but if its the latter than that's quite significant.
 

Last Week

Bench
Messages
3,726
I read it as $50m per year. Which is massive considering that it's around a quarter of the current deal.

How much would Fox Sports pay to simulcast Origin?
 

gallagher

Juniors
Messages
1,800
be nice to get the networks to broadcast in anything at the moment. No NRL in WA again as Ashes on GEM.

You were close Perth Red. No live NRL tonite in Perth, soccer and cartoons are on.
Seriously, we shouldnt even be negotiating with ch 9.
 

applesauce

Bench
Messages
3,573
NRL trying to reduce ratings. Giving away the Roosters v Tiger halftime score at halftime of the live QLD game.
 

Diesel

Referee
Messages
23,771
I thought in the contract it was to be shown on GEM live outside QLD/NSW and there was to be 2 hours a day of RL programming on FTA
 

insert.pause

First Grade
Messages
6,461
yes, the infamous 2hrs of rugby league content on ch94 every evening, three years later we are yet to see 1min of it.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Top