I mentioned to a couple of people last night that it's almost scary what sort of team we would be WITHOUT Hayne on the field.
It was at its most obvious last night that when he gets involved, we are as dangerous in attack as any team in the comp.
But for 20 minutes before half time, and ten minutes after, when he took himself out of the game, we looked a lot less potent. I know there are other factors involved, but it was as clear as any time this season, the effect Hayne has on a game.
Do we rely too much on him?
How would we cope, if he (god forbid, touch wood etc....) came down with an injury?
I have my reservations that we would currently be as clinically efficient without him.
Suity
It was at its most obvious last night that when he gets involved, we are as dangerous in attack as any team in the comp.
But for 20 minutes before half time, and ten minutes after, when he took himself out of the game, we looked a lot less potent. I know there are other factors involved, but it was as clear as any time this season, the effect Hayne has on a game.
Do we rely too much on him?
How would we cope, if he (god forbid, touch wood etc....) came down with an injury?
I have my reservations that we would currently be as clinically efficient without him.
Suity