they wont use it once the nrl realises how many forward passes there are in a game. It will go off every set
It won't know physics as good as Mik.they wont use it once the nrl realises how many forward passes there are in a game. It will go off every set
I reckon this will get ugly. PVL needs to listen to the players.What Finchy says
What the NRL says
He’s the expert on forward passes they consulted to invent the techCam Smith retired just in time.
I reckon this will get ugly. PVL needs to listen to the players.
Also the players: Lets consult and make sure that we don't make any rash decisions. Its a complex issue.The players: you should have stopped them hitting me in the head !
Also the players: FFS I need time to stop hitting people in the head !
Also the players: Lets consult and make sure that we don't make any rash decisions. Its a complex issue.
PVL: What do you mean? I've already 'sorted it' FFS.
You don’t believe the people who are both the sole perpetrators and sole victims should be consulted?The only change to the PVL iron fist approach should be a discretionary 5 min yellow card.
Otherwise ....
This goes beyond appeasing stakeholders. There was no easy way when you mandate change, like seatbelts, bike helmets, pool fences etc. When it comes down to a billion dollar business being derelict in their duty of care, you've got to draw a line in the sand and just do it. You then deal with the butt-hurt accordingly. Unlike the NFL who pretended it wasn't a problem until it was a problem, we need to be agile and on the front foot. You need to be able to demonstrate to the court (yes there will be claims) that the NRL did all things necessary to mitigate head injures as the science became available.You don’t believe the people who are both the sole perpetrators and sole victims should be consulted?
Nah. F**k them.You don’t believe the people who are both the sole perpetrators and sole victims should be consulted?
Thats a key driving factor and a significant negotiating point for the NRL but it doesn't excuse lack of consultation.This goes beyond appeasing stakeholders. There was no easy way when you mandate change, like seatbelts, bike helmets, pool fences etc. When it comes down to a billion dollar business being derelict in their duty of care, you've got to draw a line in the sand and just do it. You then deal with the butt-hurt accordingly. Unlike the NFL who pretended it wasn't a problem until it was a problem, we need to be agile and on the front foot. You need to be able to demonstrate to the court (yes there will be claims) that the NRL did all things necessary to mitigate head injures as the science became available.
The litigation shit storm has just hit the UK.
The UK concussion court case may destroy the NRL
https://www.theroar.com.au/2020/12/16/the-uk-concussion-court-case-may-destroy-the-nrl/
Thats a key driving factor and a significant negotiating point for the NRL but it doesn't excuse lack of consultation.
In fact, there's strong evidence to suggest that their actions may not even reduce concussion, or worse still increase concussion rates to defenders who are forced to tackle lower.
Poorly managed, knee-jerk stuff from the NRL.
I couldn't see anywhere in those links where they said they would start penalising and sin binning the shit out of anything that looks remotely like a high tackle.Lack of consultation ? You're talking as if PVL pulled this out of his arse one morning. They have been building for this and the clubs were aware
https://www.nrl.com/operations/the-players/management-of-concussion/
https://www.nrl.com/siteassets/operations/the-players/2021-concussion-management-guidelines_2021.pdf
https://www.concussioninsport.gov.au/
In response, the ARLC will discuss introducing a concussion sub to protect player welfare for those forced to play on through injury to get through the game following a push from the RLPA and several NRL coaches.
Sharks coach John Morris admitted he is now a convert to the idea after experiencing the carnage of Saturday night, and the system is already in place in the NSW Cup.
Woods' concern is coaches would use the 18th man to exploit the rules as an extra substitution, but the concerns for player welfare appear to outweigh the risks.
"The concerns on player health and safety outweigh debate about the challenges and complexities of having an 18th man. It's got to happen now," RLPA boss Clint Newton told Newscorp.
https://www.theadvocate.com.au/story/7186357/woods-no-fan-of-nrl-concussion-sub-push/