What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Non-eels footy stuff

Bazal

Post Whore
Messages
103,011
What does this mean? How would the NRL have any jurisdiction over them and why would they want to do that?

I think it's an allusion to Napa? Being that he allegedly wasn't the one to release his tape, which could easily make him the victim of a crime...
 

Happy MEel

First Grade
Messages
9,856
I think the fact he has been charged suggests that at least initially he disseminated the video between mates without consent. This would suggest the NRL would punish him. I haven’t seen anything to suggest Big Papi disseminated the videos. He didn’t even take the videos as opposed to May who did.
 

Bazal

Post Whore
Messages
103,011
I think the fact he has been charged suggests that at least initially he disseminated the video between mates without consent. This would suggest the NRL would punish him. I haven’t seen anything to suggest Big Papi disseminated the videos. He didn’t even take the videos as opposed to May who did.

Yeah which is the point.

In punishing Big Papi the NRL have, essentially, punished the victim. He seemingly didn't disseminate or even film the videos
 

Bazal

Post Whore
Messages
103,011
Also, I do feel sorry for Napa in a way, but in another way this Big Papi thing will never, ever get old. We should make so many signs...
 

Happy MEel

First Grade
Messages
9,856
Yeah which is the point.

In punishing Big Papi the NRL have, essentially, punished the victim. He seemingly didn't disseminate or even film the videos
Ah I see. It won’t really matter though because he’ll be punished for the dissemination and I’d say whatever punishment gets handed down will be lumped together.

My point still stands though, May isn’t really the victim if he disseminated the video in the first place (even if he didn’t leak it to the same extent). Considering he allegedly filmed one of them and has subsequently been charged, I’d say there’s a pretty high likelihood he did.
 

Soren Lorenson

First Grade
Messages
7,577
What does this mean? How would the NRL have any jurisdiction over them and why would they want to do that?
Pointing out the irony of Napa being punished by the NRL after someone disseminated a lewwwd video of him. Perhaps the difference is that Napa wasn't videoed without consent. I don't know....there's too many sides of these stories to form a black and white opinion
 

Soren Lorenson

First Grade
Messages
7,577
OK, here's a question I just thought of.. If the NRL fines a player, how do they collect the money. i assuem the clubs have a payroll system which pays wages into a nominated bank account etc like everyone else in the world. How does the NRL get it then? What if the player refuses to pay?
 

Twizzle

Administrator
Staff member
Messages
153,176
Pointing out the irony of Napa being punished by the NRL after someone disseminated a lewwwd video of him. Perhaps the difference is that Napa wasn't videoed without consent. I don't know....there's too many sides of these stories to form a black and white opinion

Greenberg said that some one has to pay for damage to the NRL brand so Napa was his bunny, he had no one else to punish in this case as Napa was the only NRL player involved that comes under Greenberg's jurisdiction

He has also said it may not be fair but some one has to pay.
 

Soren Lorenson

First Grade
Messages
7,577
Greenberg said that some one has to pay for damage to the NRL brand so Napa was his bunny, he had no one else to punish in this case as Napa was the only NRL player involved that comes under Greenberg's jurisdiction

He has also said it may not be fair but some one has to pay.
Which brings to my mind, is he just being seen to be paying? Financially that is. NRL has to be seen to be doing something, but really what authority do they have to financially penalise someone? Or do they withhold grant money to the club then it's up to the club to pass this on. I'm starting to think that they are digging themselves a deeper hole but I do feel a bit sorry for them in a way because they are trying to stop stupidity.
 

Twizzle

Administrator
Staff member
Messages
153,176
Which brings to my mind, is he just being seen to be paying? Financially that is. NRL has to be seen to be doing something, but really what authority do they have to financially penalise someone? Or do they withhold grant money to the club then it's up to the club to pass this on. I'm starting to think that they are digging themselves a deeper hole but I do feel a bit sorry for them in a way because they are trying to stop stupidity.

anyone's guess mate, this is Greenberg we are talking about, worst administrator we have ever had
 

Dibs

Bench
Messages
4,215
If May released tapes of other players without their consent then they are victims of a crime. I thought that was what he was charged with.
I could be way off but I thought some former Penrith player has released them. May is charged with sharing them with this dude and maybe others but who the f*ck really knows
 

Latest posts

Top