What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Non Footy Chat Thread II

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
78,313
6 years? .... fmd ... what do you get for rape?

If you read the sentence statement, he gave him a non parole pd of 3.75 years bc he is nearly 80 years old and his heart is f**ked.

Personally he should have been given 5 lots of 10 years.
 
Messages
42,876
The ABC started the popularisation of the term in HG and Roy's Club Buggery.....one of the singers was 'Muff Merkin'.
Good show but they didn't say merkin, they said the word LU changes to merkin. It was at about 9:01pm so maybe the banned words list allows it after 9pm now? Dunno but I've never heard it on regular tv.
 

Gary Gutful

Post Whore
Messages
53,239
You staying at the Chancellor???
Close, but no cigar.

I didn’t stay there but lots of merkins who live out of town did. They had their two days in Brisbane to be negative know it all merkins who think they are smarter than the executives.

They’ve gone back to their shitholes now to continue f**king things and blaming everyone other than themselves.

#WeAreOneTeam
 

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
78,313
I need to go to Brisbane in a few weeks. I have to go to Woolongabba (sp).

Where should I stay ?
 

Kornstar

Coach
Messages
15,578
In pre-sentence statements, Pell’s lawyers addressed the court on a “let’s pretend he’s guilty” basis. Accordingly they raised his age etc, and also quite remarkably, referred to the sexual penetration charge as a vanilla type offence in the scale of sexual assaults.

Ok, so why would they do the “let’s pretend he’s guilty” and that he part of the verdict reading? It read as fact.

I’ve never read one of those things before and f**k it was long and boring.

There must have been some significant evidence (that is not clear anywhere) for them to find him guilty given it was committed over 20 years ago. I can only assume the kid who had to take it in his mouth could describe aspects of his penis and general area in detail?

Were there witnesses that maybe came forward but they haven’t been mentioned.

Short of the lawyers admitting guilt inadvertently or whatever i can’t reconcile based on what I’ve tried to read how they got the guilty verdict. I’m not defending him or anything either, I’m sure he’s done it and despite what that verdict reading says it probably isn’t a an isolated incident, or more specifically to that 2 month period.
 

Latest posts

Top