Agree 100%. I was posting tongue-in-cheek because in the USA when a white merkin shot up a mosque he was just called a sicko. The guy in charge in the USA
View attachment 28077 refused to label it as terrorism. Seems that term is only reserved for brown people.
I get it......
All of them are sicko's but that seems like an easy way out these days. Mental health and all that. We're not big on personal responsibility anymore. But i'll leave that there.
Truly, there is probably some difference about the terrorism that was committed say on 9/11, Paris etc. vs these types but it is nothing to do with skin colour and everything to do with religion and the hatred of the west en mass from that direction.
This today, while absolutely terrorism is a retaliation on the perceived image and revenge on how the west has approached islam and their assimilation (or lack thereof in many peoples eyes) into our society.
Are either acceptable? f**k no! Do i understand the reporting of it? Kind of. It isn't how i would personally go about it but i kind of get it.......it is probably reported differently over in the east too......you don't think there is media over there that cheer and celebrate when they kill westerners and equally try and drive hatred when events like today happen?
The saddest thing is, i reckon i could think of at least 5 people i know that if i heard they did something like this it wouldn't surprise me in the slightest and they would absolutely believe it was justified.......it is a level of hatred i cannot understand........
There is no solution to hate in this world, short of killing anyone who displays hatred towards another race.
