What's new
By:
Advanced search…
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Non Footy Chat Thread II

Gronk

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
78,035
strider said:
I dont wash clothes. Hence the need for a machine
Click to expand...
When we used to live in an apartment, we owned a Bendix washer/dryer. It washes your clothes and then turns itself into a condenser dyer whereby the moisture is extracted and chucked down the drain. Great invention but OTT expensive unless you need to save space.
 
S

Suitman

Post Whore
Messages
56,168
Dust storm approaching Mildura yesterday afternoon.

D58qi1cU0AEEvp9.jpg
 
I

Incorrect

Coach
Messages
12,977
Bandwagon said:
I've got a fischer and pykel top loader a few years ago, and it's been pretty good, clothes are clean, reasonably quick cycle time , prior had a front loader, takes too f**king long to do a wash cycle, prior to that another F&P I had for about 15 years or so, it was still working when we replaced it with the front loader which we did for water saving ( was on tank water at the time ) My now ex has the front loader ( which she hates )

Life is good.
Click to expand...
Ahhh yes, you just reminded me of the biggest drawback with the front loader we had, it took forever for a was to finish.
 
Snoochies

Snoochies

First Grade
Messages
5,634
So Israel has been found guilty.

From my own Christian perspective, there has been some pretty major facts that have been missed in the whole saga and I'm not too worried about the suppression of freedom of speech and not concerned with the apparent anti Christian rhetoric that is being spouted out. In fact, Israel is the one to blame here and the common argument that he merely "quoted the Bible" is false, he is not being sacked for quoting the Bible.

Israels infamous "Drunks, homosexuals, atheist...........hell awaits" post is NOT a Bible quote and it's actually this picture and not the Bible quotes he later posted that has gotten him in this mess.

Go back and look at the actual Bible quotes he posted after the picture, the Bible quotes and the picture do not match, not one Bible quote referenced homosexuals or hell, only his original picture did so to say he is being targeted for quoting the Bible is false.

In fact, if he had merely just put those Bible quotes up, he would not be in this mess.

Regardless of what Israel believes, RA are not trying to stop him from believing those things but being in his position they've ask to restrain from promoting those views. Here he has 2 choices, agree or disagree.

Now from my own theological perspective, Israels 'hell' in my opinion is also false which is another matter on it's own and the way Israel has been preaching about 'hell' was never done by the apostles. Theologically I think he's messed up, his heart is in the wrong place and I fear he's lost all this over nothing and one day if he realises he may have in fact preached false theology with a hard heart, he's gonna have some regret over his actions.

Anyway, I'm cool with the skydaddy, fairytale stuff I get, don't wanna suppress that stuff either. Flame away.
 
Gronk

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
78,035
Snoochies said:
So Israel has been found guilty.

From my own Christian perspective, there has been some pretty major facts that have been missed in the whole saga and I'm not too worried about the suppression of freedom of speech and not concerned with the apparent anti Christian rhetoric that is being spouted out. In fact, Israel is the one to blame here and the common argument that he merely "quoted the Bible" is false, he is not being sacked for quoting the Bible.

Israels infamous "Drunks, homosexuals, atheist...........hell awaits" post is NOT a Bible quote and it's actually this picture and not the Bible quotes he later posted that has gotten him in this mess.

Go back and look at the actual Bible quotes he posted after the picture, the Bible quotes and the picture do not match, not one Bible quote referenced homosexuals or hell, only his original picture did so to say he is being targeted for quoting the Bible is false.

In fact, if he had merely just put those Bible quotes up, he would not be in this mess.

Regardless of what Israel believes, RA are not trying to stop him from believing those things but being in his position they've ask to restrain from promoting those views. Here he has 2 choices, agree or disagree.

Now from my own theological perspective, Israels 'hell' in my opinion is also false which is another matter on it's own and the way Israel has been preaching about 'hell' was never done by the apostles. Theologically I think he's messed up, his heart is in the wrong place and I fear he's lost all this over nothing and one day if he realises he may have in fact preached false theology with a hard heart, he's gonna have some regret over his actions.

Anyway, I'm cool with the skydaddy, fairytale stuff I get, don't wanna suppress that stuff either. Flame away.
Click to expand...
Bottom line is that you dont bite the hand that feeds you. I think Moses said that. Prolly Mitch.
 
SDM

SDM

First Grade
Messages
7,600
Snoochies said:
So Israel has been found guilty.

From my own Christian perspective, there has been some pretty major facts that have been missed in the whole saga and I'm not too worried about the suppression of freedom of speech and not concerned with the apparent anti Christian rhetoric that is being spouted out. In fact, Israel is the one to blame here and the common argument that he merely "quoted the Bible" is false, he is not being sacked for quoting the Bible.

Israels infamous "Drunks, homosexuals, atheist...........hell awaits" post is NOT a Bible quote and it's actually this picture and not the Bible quotes he later posted that has gotten him in this mess.

Go back and look at the actual Bible quotes he posted after the picture, the Bible quotes and the picture do not match, not one Bible quote referenced homosexuals or hell, only his original picture did so to say he is being targeted for quoting the Bible is false.

In fact, if he had merely just put those Bible quotes up, he would not be in this mess.

Regardless of what Israel believes, RA are not trying to stop him from believing those things but being in his position they've ask to restrain from promoting those views. Here he has 2 choices, agree or disagree.

Now from my own theological perspective, Israels 'hell' in my opinion is also false which is another matter on it's own and the way Israel has been preaching about 'hell' was never done by the apostles. Theologically I think he's messed up, his heart is in the wrong place and I fear he's lost all this over nothing and one day if he realises he may have in fact preached false theology with a hard heart, he's gonna have some regret over his actions.

Anyway, I'm cool with the skydaddy, fairytale stuff I get, don't wanna suppress that stuff either. Flame away.
Click to expand...

The media are trying to make more of the moral/theology/free speech side of things to stir up some clicks.

It is actually a very simple matter relating to terms of employment.
 
Gronk

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
78,035
SDM said:
The media are trying to make more of the moral/theology/free speech side of things to stir up some clicks.

It is actually a very simple matter relating to terms of employment.
Click to expand...

Can I just say from a religious POV the Catholic church have publicly positioned themselves as an employer which requires their employees to maintain certain beliefs and have made it known that supporters of SSM and abortion etc are not welcome. I think most would say that it would be reasonable that if an high profile employee went rogue on the church that termination of their employment would be an appropriate stance.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Top