I've never heard NASA referred to as a crayon before...
But a little breakdown of the above won't hurt...
Just because a part of the map does have yellow, orange or red doesn't mean they will go through endless droughts. Southeast Asia, for example, has the colours above but is also known for significant rainfall. There has just been a lessening of that rainfall and while that may have some implications, "OMFG!!! They're all going to die in a drought!!! Climate Change!!!" is not one of them.
The northern region of South America is the same.
But some places that are known for regular droughts do seem additionally exposed - the southern part of Africa and the Mediterranean are the obvious places on the map above.
However...Australia and North America have increased rainfall and more than make up for the SA/Med declines, especially since both places are known for droughts and so now have a reduced risk/occurence.
So, while Bandy's generic, meaningless point of "Precipitation isn't felt uniformly across the world" is valid (such insight there, Bandy. Why haven't you received the Nobel prize, yet?) it is, as I just stated, meaningless.
Of course changes in climate aren't felt uniformly across the world. We shouldn't be shocked to hear that.
But, overall, there is an increase in precipitation and, when looked at in more detail, the areas where there is less are fewer in number than those with more, and known drought affected areas have, on the whole, received increased precipitation rather than decreased.
So, my points are still correct - there is less drought, as per NASA and the EPA, and the current bushfires are not connected to "climate change", as per the IPCC.