Non Footy Chat Thread II

[Gronk]

If you don't know about them already then you really have no legitimate interest in the topic, so I'm not going to put too much effort into posting links because you really don't want to see past your confirmation bias.

As for Hillary not laughing over the situation - that in itself is hilarious. When you laugh like Clinton does in the previous clip then you are laughing at the victim and have no right to claim you support women or victims of sexual assault, as Clinton does.

Let's not forget, too, that Clinton stated that the girl was lying, that she romantacised having affairs with older men, and that generally she was full of shit. By the way, that information isn't hard to find, either...

Attempting to quote a lawyers defence used in court as her personal opinion is imbecilic.

You clearly fail to understand what lawyers who practice in criminal law actually do.

She worked for legal aid. Her job was to defend every scumbag presented to her. Do you think that young lawyers pick and choose cases ? I guess not. You're way out of your depth here Donald.

 

[Gary Gutful]

If you don't know about them already then you really have no legitimate interest in the topic, so I'm not going to put too much effort into posting links because you really don't want to see past your confirmation bias.

As for Hillary not laughing over the situation - that in itself is hilarious. When you laugh like Clinton does in the previous clip then you are laughing at the victim and have no right to claim you support women or victims of sexual assault, as Clinton does.

Let's not forget, too, that Clinton stated that the girl was lying, that she romantacised having affairs with older men, and that generally she was full of shit. By the way, that information isn't hard to find, either...

You are assuming I don't know anything about them which is wrong and again reeks of smugness.

The fact that you just throw shit out there and when questioned take a high and mighty approach and belittle people says a lot about you.

You are just a parrot. You've read a couple of things that you think no-one else has read but not critically reviewed them, unfortunately.

Also in case you f**ken missed it, I have already stated that:

I DONT SUPPORT EITHER OF THEM!!!!!!!!!!!

In fact, I think I have mentioned it at least 3 times.

 

[Kornstar]

You are assuming I don't know anything about them which is wrong and again reeks of smugness.

The fact that you just throw shit out there and when questioned take a high and mighty approach and belittle people says a lot about you.

You are just a parrot. You've read a couple of things that you think no-one else has read but not critically reviewed them, unfortunately.

Also in case you f**ken missed it, I have already stated that:

I DONT SUPPORT EITHER OF THEM!!!!!!!!!!!

In fact, I think I have mentioned it at least 3 times.

The important thing is, is the above the 3rd time or now 4th time?

Just so you can keep track because you will have to say it again because you clearly favour Clinton and think she is the perfect candidate

 

[Gary Gutful]

I heart Trump.

 

[Gronk]

I heart Trump.

I heart his daughter. It seems that Donald does too.

 

[Avenger]

If he stood down would Pence beat Hillary?

 

[Gronk]

If he stood down would Pence beat Hillary?

I heard it's too late for anything like that. Merkins have already started postal voting a month ago.

 

[Gary Gutful]

I'm with you dancing banana.

 

[Hollywood Jesus]

I don't support Trump, although I am absolutely loving the shitposting that is going on and the general hysterics he is causing.

But I'm the parrot? Gronk is the very definition of a parrot and that's why I'm posting this stuff. Clinton is the epitome of political corruption yet Trump makes a statement that 10 years ago every man and his dog was mouthing every 5 minutes and it's the end of the world.

But Clinton never does anything wrong.

Despite laughing about getting off a child rapist (not lamenting the shit parts of her job that force her to do it, but laughing...), despite a plethora of dumped emails about everything from the Clinton Foundation to supplying arms to ISIS...not a bad word about her.

Nope, it's all about Trump. Now, the guy is a f**kwit (I haven't heard anyone disagree with that statement) but he pales in comparison to the Clintons.

But that's OK...nothing to see here...

 

[Gary Gutful]

I don't support Trump, although I am absolutely loving the shitposting that is going on and the general hysterics he is causing.

But I'm the parrot? Gronk is the very definition of a parrot and that's why I'm posting this stuff. Clinton is the epitome of political corruption yet Trump makes a statement that 10 years ago every man and his dog was mouthing every 5 minutes and it's the end of the world.

But Clinton never does anything wrong.

Despite laughing about getting off a child rapist (not lamenting the shit parts of her job that force her to do it, but laughing...), despite a plethora of dumped emails about everything from the Clinton Foundation to supplying arms to ISIS...not a bad word about her.

Nope, it's all about Trump. Now, the guy is a f**kwit (I haven't heard anyone disagree with that statement) but he pales in comparison to the Clintons.

But that's OK...nothing to see here...

They are both shit in my book.

And yes you are right, as much as I love Gronk he can be a parrot at times and incredibly partisan.

Good talk Beardo. We should do it again some time.

 

[I'm a loser baby...]

How cool was Firefly? Unbelievable it lasted just one season.

 

[Gronk]

Serious question: Is Nick Kyrgios bi-polar ? He powers through the field to win Japan, then could not be bothered to compete in the Shanghai Masters. I watched him last night on ESPN. This is beyond just being a brat I think.

 

[Gronk]

I don't support Trump, although I am absolutely loving the shitposting that is going on and the general hysterics he is causing.

But I'm the parrot? Gronk is the very definition of a parrot and that's why I'm posting this stuff. Clinton is the epitome of political corruption yet Trump makes a statement that 10 years ago every man and his dog was mouthing every 5 minutes and it's the end of the world.

But Clinton never does anything wrong.

Despite laughing about getting off a child rapist (not lamenting the shit parts of her job that force her to do it, but laughing...), despite a plethora of dumped emails about everything from the Clinton Foundation to supplying arms to ISIS...not a bad word about her.

Nope, it's all about Trump. Now, the guy is a f**kwit (I haven't heard anyone disagree with that statement) but he pales in comparison to the Clintons.

But that's OK...nothing to see here...

I'll give you credit here. You continue to throw mud at Clinton without any facts to back you up. It's Tony Abbott opposition leader 101. Say something ad nauseam and hopefully people will eventually accept it as fact.

I'll give you an irrefutable fact: Trump is a A Grade f**kwit.

It is clear that a large chunk of USA punters don't rate Clinton in this two horse race. What I don't get is how the Republicans have failed to find a cleanskin nominee with no skeletons in the closet. Massive fail because he/she would probably have won this campaign in a canter by 4 lengths.

 

[Gary Gutful]

I'll give you credit here. You continue to throw mud at Clinton without any facts to back you up. It's Tony Abbott opposition leader 101. Say something ad nauseam and hopefully people will eventually accept it as fact.

I'll give you an irrefutable fact: Trump is a A Grade f**kwit.

It is clear that a large chunk of USA punters don't rate Clinton in this two horse race. What I don't get is how the Republicans have failed to find a cleanskin nominee with no skeletons in the closet. Massive fail because he/she would probably have won this campaign in a canter by 4 lengths.

You'd like to think both parties could have come up with something better than Clinton and Trump.

By suggesting that the republicans could have won easily if they didn't have Trump are you conceding that Hilary is perhaps not the best option for the Democrats?

Serious question. Not trying to put words in your mouth.

 

[Gronk]

You'd like to think both parties could have come up with something better than Clinton and Trump.

By suggesting that the republicans could have won easily if they didn't have Trump are you conceding that Hilary is perhaps not the best option for the Democrats?

Serious question. Not trying to put words in your mouth.

Punters seem to dislike her. Is that because mud has stuck or the fact that she brings middle east baggage with her ? Dunno, but they should have seen this coming. Pick between Clinton and the old guy next door who likes gardening Sanders, you pick Clinton because she has got the experience to do the job. Was she the best choice ? No compare her CV to Obama or Trudeau from Canada no way. They could have done much better.

But like it or not it's a two horse race, so they need to go with the lesser of two evils.

 

[carson]

While we are on the topic of horses asses...My horse Aspen Star is running in the last at Gosford today. We are hoping he finally breaks his maiden status...

 

[Gronk]

While we are on the topic of horses asses...My horse Aspen Star is running in the last at Gosford today. We are hoping he finally breaks his maiden status...

If it's at Gosford, Foran and his mate Eddie will be on it for sure.

Good luck anyway !

 

[carson]

If it's at Gosford, Foran and his mate Eddie will be on it for sure.

Good luck anyway !

Well that explains the unexpected deposit in my tab account....just mates.

 

[Avenger]

Trump is a f**kwit but I find Hillary worse. The Clintons are corrupt garbage and the fact that they again will be running the joint shows just how low America has gone.

A real shame. Been to the US plenty of times and I'll go again. Their country is awesome to visit and generally the people are great.

Pence will wait 4 years and then win in a landslide and that baggy pants wearing pretender with the fat ankles can finally be thrown out on her ear.

 

[Hollywood Jesus]

I'll give you an irrefutable fact: Trump is a A Grade f**kwit.

Not arguing with that.

It is clear that a large chunk of USA punters don't rate Clinton in this two horse race. What I don't get is how the Republicans have failed to find a cleanskin nominee with no skeletons in the closet. Massive fail because he/she would probably have won this campaign in a canter by 4 lengths.

I guess you still don't understand why Trump is the nominee?

People are fed up with the same old bullshit. It's why Sanders did decently (not because America is ready to turn socialist). A lot of people are fed up with the same old PC bullshit. Getting ripped off by the left and the right is exactly the same to them, now, and they f**king hate it.

It's the same reason why One Nation is back, NXT has risen and Australia is now beset with minor parties.

No one actually agrees with what they say (well, almost nobody) but, f**k it, give the non-politician a go because it can't be any worse, and we can stick it to those self-serving merkins at the same time.

In this vein, Trump and Hanson are great candidates.

Unless the West wakes up and realises that it needs a radical rethink of how politicians operate then this is new normal.