HJ Fact check
Nothing about her laughing at getting off a child rapist.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...p/trump-says-clinton-laughed-about-rape-case/
At the time, Clinton, 27, was working at a University of Arkansas legal aid clinic. The accused man was indigent and specifically asked for a woman to represent him.
He ultimately pleaded guilty to unlawful fondling of a minor, receiving a year in jail and four years' probation.
When we asked the Trump campaign about the allegations, a spokesman referred us to a July 15, 2014, article in the conservative Washington Free Beacon, which uncovered audio recordings of Clinton, although it's not clear when the recordings were made. The Beacon says they date from 1983 to 1987.
In the tapes, she calls it a "terrible case" and "a fascinating case," for reasons that will become clear.
The article notes that she can be heard laughing at several points on the tape, but it doesn't say she was laughing at the victim, as Trump claims.
Nothing about her using an executive order to make gun manufacturers responsible for any deaths caused by weapons they make.
http://www.npr.org/sections/itsallp...-totally-free-of-liability-for-their-behavior
Who cares ? Gun control is crucial in the USA. Facts about the issue are here and Clinton is only seeking to overturn the protectionism that the gun manufacturers currently have.
Nothing about selling arms to Libyan rebels or Friends of Syria (read: Daesh).
https://www.truthorfiction.com/hillary-clinton-sold-weapons-isis/
So, given that we couldn’t find emails indicating that Clinton had pushed weapons into Syria or to ISIS, and Corker’s account of his meeting with Syrians at the Turkish border contradicts those reports, and Clinton’s tenure as secretary of state doesn’t line up with weapons shipments to Syria, we’re calling this one fiction.
Nothing about using the Clinton Foundation as a funnel for funds from selling state secrets or favours.
The Clinton Foundation certainly used their profile to raise funds. Some might say that they did this in a way that seemingly a corporation or country could "buy time" with secretary of state (Joe Hockey anyone?). There is no evidence that they sold secrets. That's spin.
Nothing about intimidating the victims of Bill's sexual assaults into silence.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...-trump-says-hillary-clinton-viciously-attack/
What we found is that Hillary Clinton has been accused of threatening or shaming accusers of Bill Clinton. But all the accusations remain unproven, as do the specific allegations against Bill Clinton. In most cases, evidence Hillary Clinton intervened in any significant way doesn’t exist.
Nothing about paid speeches to Wall St. executives totally contradicting her public comments regarding trade and immigration.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/08/us/politics/hillary-clinton-speeches-wikileaks.html
Yes she has a far more liberal attitude to free trade agreements, cross border cooperation and immigration. Yet the congress are far too conservative (save Obama) to stomach it. She and Turnbull have a lot in common.
If you disagree with any of the above HJ or feel that the links are partisan, then by all means post credible facts debunking them.
